[lng-odp] ODP-DPDK: tagging 1.19.0.2

Hello, As ODP-generic 1.19.0.2 is not fully compatible with the 1.19.0.0/0.1 tags, is there any plan to tag/release ODP-DPDK 1.19.0.2, so that I can use it for Debian package builds? -- With best wishes Dmitry

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

gt; >> 7.6M. >> >>> >>>> >> But >> >>> >>>> >> anyway it's better to test performance for this PR because >> >>> >>>> >> previous >> >>> >>>> >> speed was 10M. >> >>>

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

> >>> >>>> >> On 12/04/17 19:42, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > >>> >>>> >>> Can you run with Linux-DPDK in ODP 2.0? > >>> >>>> >>> > >>> >>>> >>> On 4 Decemb

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

://lng.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/23252.0) >>> >>>> >>>>> I >>> >>>> >>>>> see: >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> ODP_REPO='https://github.com/muvarov/odp' >&

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

> >>>> after clean patches apply and fix in run scripts I made it > run. > >> >>>> >>>> > >> >>>> >>>> But results is really bad. --enable-dpdk-zero-copy > >> >>>> >>>> > >> >

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

lly bad. --enable-dpdk-zero-copy >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> TX rate is: >> >>>> >>>> 7673155 pps >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> RX rate is: >> >>>&

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

e patch PR 313 TX was 10M pps. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> I re run task and TX is 3.3M pps. All tests are single core. So > >>>> >>>> something strange happens in lava or this PR. > >>>> >>>>

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

gt;> >>>>> On TX (https://lng.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/23252.0) I >>>> >>>>> see: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> ODP_REPO='https://github.com/muvarov/odp' >>>> >>>>> ODP_BRANCH='

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

>> ODP_REPO='https://github.com/muvarov/odp' >>> >>>>> ODP_BRANCH='api-next' >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On RX (https://lng.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/23252.1) I &

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

uvarov/odp' >> >>>>> ODP_BRANCH='devel/api-next_shsum' >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> or are you referring to other test? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

are you referring to other test? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4 December 2017 at 15:53, Maxim Uvarov > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 4 December 2017 at 15:11, Bogdan Pricope

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

are you referring to other test? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4 December 2017 at 15:53, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4 December 2017 at 15:11, Bogdan Pricope >>>>>> wrote: >&g

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

need to put 313 on TX side (not RX). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> both rx and tx have patches from 313. l2fwd works on recv side. Generator >>>>> does not work. >>>>> >>>>> Maxim. >>>>> &g

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

ks on recv side. Generator >>>> does not work. >>>> >>>> Maxim. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4 December 2017 at 13:19, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >>>>> wrote: >>>

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

>>> >>>> >>>> On 4 December 2017 at 13:19, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >>>> wrote: >>>>> Is the DPDK version 17.08 ? Other versions might not work properly. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>&g

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

xim. >> >> >>> >>> >>> On 4 December 2017 at 13:19, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >>> wrote: >>>> Is the DPDK version 17.08 ? Other versions might not work properly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Petri >>>>

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

gt;> >>> >>> On 4 December 2017 at 13:19, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >>> wrote: >>>> Is the DPDK version 17.08 ? Other versions might not work properly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Petri >>>>

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

t;> > >> > >> > -Petri >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org] >> > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 1:10 PM >> > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) >> > Cc: Bogdan Pricope ; l

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

ia - FI/Espoo) > > Cc: Bogdan Pricope ; lng-odp-forward > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk > > > > > > > > 313 does not work also: > > > > https://lng.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/23242.1 > > > > I wi

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

t: Monday, December 04, 2017 1:10 PM > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) > Cc: Bogdan Pricope ; lng-odp-forward > > > > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk > > > > 313 does not work also: > > https://lng.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/23242.1 > &g

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

Is the DPDK version 17.08 ? Other versions might not work properly. -Petri From: Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 1:10 PM To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) Cc: Bogdan Pricope ; lng-odp-forward Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk 313 does not

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

al Message- > > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of > > Bogdan Pricope > > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 12:21 PM > > To: Maxim Uvarov > > Cc: lng-odp-forward > > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk > > > > I suspec

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

> To: Maxim Uvarov > Cc: lng-odp-forward > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk > > I suspect this is actually caused by csum issue in TX side: on RX, > socket pktio does not validate csum (and accept the packets) but on > dpdk pktio the csum is validated and packets are dropped

Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk

I suspect this is actually caused by csum issue in TX side: on RX, socket pktio does not validate csum (and accept the packets) but on dpdk pktio the csum is validated and packets are dropped. I am not seeing this in my setup because default txq_flags for igb driver (1G interface) is .txq_flags =

[lng-odp] odp dpdk

Looking to dpdk pktio support and generator. It looks like receive part is broken. If for receive I use sockets it works well but receive with dpdk does not get any packets. For both master and api-next. Can somebody confirm please that it's so. Lava is not supper friendly to debug issue. 1. Rec

Re: [lng-odp] odp-dpdk gives error with "configure" command

Thank you. It works fine now. P Gyanesh Patra On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 05:54 Elo Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < mailto:Elo Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) > wrote: a, pre, code, a:link, body { word-wrap: break-word !important; } > On 28 Jan 2017, at 23:38, Gyanesh Patra < mailto:pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.co

Re: [lng-odp] odp-dpdk gives error with "configure" command

> On 28 Jan 2017, at 23:38, Gyanesh Patra wrote: > > odp-dpdk repo gives error for “configure” command when tried with dpdk 16.07 > and dpdk 17. I am running on ubuntu16 LTS. > > ./configure --with-dpdk-path=./dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc > > checking rte_config.h usability... no > > che

[lng-odp] odp-dpdk gives error with "configure" command

odp-dpdk repo gives error for “configure” command when tried with dpdk 16.07 and dpdk 17. I am running on ubuntu16 LTS.  ./configure --with-dpdk-path=./dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc checking rte_config.h usability... no checking rte_config.h presence... no checking for rte_config.h... no co

Re: [lng-odp] ODP dpdk pktio build broken in api-next

Hi, Good that the problem is fixed. It would help a bit (and we should really do it anyway) if we at least build all the pktio types (netmap, dpdk etc.) in the CI system. Implementing this shouldn't take much effort. The build has been broken with optional pktio types way too often in the recen

Re: [lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] odp_generator ":PMD requires >32 buffers burst"

Hi Nicolas, The issue about QUEUE_MULTI_MAX being 8 will disappear when you start using DPDK 2.2. The ixgbe driver lowered the requirement for minimum receive batch size to 4. I'll push the patches for 2.2 support on ODP-DPDK probably tomorrow, if nothing objects on the patches. Regards, Zo

Re: [lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] SpanningTree and block a port ?

lling link state: https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2015-September/015557.html Regards, Brian From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Kury Nicolas Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 8:50 AM To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: [lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] SpanningTree a

Re: [lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] odp_generator ":PMD requires >32 buffers burst"

Hi, Note, there is a lng-odp-d...@lists.linaro.org list for ODP-DPDK specific issues. On 06/10/15 12:03, Kury Nicolas wrote: Hi I have to NIC. A HP560SFP+ 10G (82599ES) and a Intel EXPI9301CT 1G (82574L), I have some problems when I run odp_generator from ODP-DPDK v1.2.0.0_DPDK_2.1.0-rc3.

Re: [lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] SpanningTree and block a port ?

or blocked ports. Note the API for polling link state: https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2015-September/015557.html Regards, Brian From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Kury Nicolas Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 8:50 AM To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subj

[lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] odp_generator ":PMD requires >32 buffers burst"

Hi I have to NIC. A HP560SFP+ 10G (82599ES) and a Intel EXPI9301CT 1G (82574L), I have some problems when I run odp_generator from ODP-DPDK v1.2.0.0_DPDK_2.1.0-rc3. First problem. With the HP560SFP+ 10G, there is the messages "PMD requires >32 buffers burst. Current 8" when I receive paquet

[lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] SpanningTree and block a port ?

Hi I would like to implement an application with spanning tree protocol. But can the application "spanningtree" stop and start a port used by another applications (exemple odp_generator) ? Here a diagram: http://s8.postimg.org/yis5flhed/spanningtree.png For exemple, if the link #1 is down,

Re: [lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] Question about arguments for odp_generator

Hi, There is a separate list for ODP-DPDK, I've put it in the Cc. You can pass your parameters via ODP_PLATFORM_PARAMS environment variable: https://git.linaro.org/lng/odp-dpdk.git/blob/HEAD:/platform/linux-dpdk/README#l225 Regards, Zoltan On 14/09/15 12:13, Kury Nicolas wrote: Hi I have

[lng-odp] [ODP-DPDK] Question about arguments for odp_generator

Hi I have DPDK 2.1.0 and ODP-DPDK v1.2.0.0_DPDK_2.1.0. I would like to try the exemple odp_generator but I didn't find how tu use the arguments of DPDK. It seems that -c (bitmask of cores to run on) and -n ( Number of memory channels) aren't recognized. Exemple with a application from DPDK

[lng-odp] ODP-DPDK Headroom + Mempool problem

Hi All, I am using odp-dpdk(odp-0.2 tag). I am testing odp-ipsec application. To add ESP and AH header in case of encryption, I am moving header into HEADROOM instead of moving the payload and put header. I am able to make it successful. But once in a while i am facing header corruption issue beca

[lng-odp] ODP-DPDK mailing list and bug tracker anounced

Anyone wishing to follow the X86 DPDK based implementation for ODP might like to subscribe to http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp-dpdk Bug

[lng-odp] ODP-DPDK

All, As we ramp up odp-dpdk development, do we need a separate mail list for that specific platform work ? Mike -- *Mike Holmes* Linaro Sr Technical Manager LNG - ODP ___ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/li

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

On 09/03/2014 02:45 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: "Patch to test multi-queue support on ODP-DPDK without " with multi-queue. Tested-by : Santosh Shukla Santosh thanks for testing this! Unfortunately I can not modify commits in public repo, so this record will be here in mailing list. Best rega

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

On 09/03/2014 02:48 PM, Venkatesh Vivekanandan wrote: Hi Maxim, Can you please add the Tested-by to the below commit, I can not change existence commits. But we can have this for record in mailing list. Maxim. commit e9e7bc237086d6d07dc004e591063838a12563ed Author: Venkatesh Vivekanandan

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

Hi Maxim, Can you please add the Tested-by to the below commit, commit e9e7bc237086d6d07dc004e591063838a12563ed Author: Venkatesh Vivekanandan Date: Tue Aug 5 20:24:05 2014 +0530 ODP-DPDK multi-queue support Thanks, Venky On 3 September 2014 16:15, Santosh Shukla wrote: > "Patch to t

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

"Patch to test multi-queue support on ODP-DPDK without " with multi-queue. Tested-by : Santosh Shukla On 3 September 2014 16:10, Santosh Shukla wrote: > Confirmed. It is working. > > On 1 September 2014 14:09, Venkatesh Vivekanandan > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 28 August 2014 12:04, Santosh Shukla

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

Confirmed. It is working. On 1 September 2014 14:09, Venkatesh Vivekanandan wrote: > > > > On 28 August 2014 12:04, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> >> No hw availability for this week, Next week I will have x86 boxes with >> me so expect to see multi-queue update from me. Thanks. >> > > It is better if

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

On 28 August 2014 12:04, Santosh Shukla wrote: > No hw availability for this week, Next week I will have x86 boxes with > me so expect to see multi-queue update from me. Thanks. > > It is better if you can close this off when your setup is back. It takes hardly 10-15 min once you have the setup.

Re: [lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

No hw availability for this week, Next week I will have x86 boxes with me so expect to see multi-queue update from me. Thanks. On 28 August 2014 12:01, Venkatesh Vivekanandan wrote: > Hi Santosh/Mike, > > I would like to get this to closure. Can you please check the multi-queue > support for odp-

[lng-odp] ODP-DPDK multi queue support

Hi Santosh/Mike, I would like to get this to closure. Can you please check the multi-queue support for odp-dpdk?. It is just that you have to generate packets with different dstip's from odp_generator. Please refer "Patch to test multi-queue support on ODP-DPDK without Ixia" email for the test set