This is timely. I'll add it to the agenda for tomorrow's ODP call.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Radu-Andrei Bulie radu.bu...@freescale.com
wrote:
Hi,
There are two items I would like to discuss:
1. I have sent an email regarding the schedule tests issues (this
could be a
Hi,
There are two items I would like to discuss:
1. I have sent an email regarding the schedule tests issues (this could
be a general issue)
To relieve from a search on the mailing list I will paste the content (and make
a resumee):
I have some observations regarding the odp_scheduler
We have the same kind of issue with our port.
We don't want (more precisely cannot for the moment) more than a thread per
core.
The way we handled it is by tweaking the implementation of cpu_count and the
default_mask to ignore the first core (which is running the main).
It would make sense to
Radu-Andrei,
we also needed to limit number of workers for dpdk:
https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp-dpdk/2015-June/000844.html
I will send this patch to main mailing list.
Maxim.
On 06/29/15 17:44, Bill Fischofer wrote:
This is timely. I'll add it to the agenda for tomorrow's ODP
On 06/29/15 19:05, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
We have the same kind of issue with our port.
We don't want (more precisely cannot for the moment) more than a thread per
core.
The way we handled it is by tweaking the implementation of cpu_count and the
default_mask to ignore the first
