On 22 May 2015 at 06:57, Bala Manoharan wrote:
> On 21 May 2015 at 16:44, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> > On 21 May 2015 at 09:53, Jerin Jacob
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> >>> On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob
> wrote:
> >>> > On Wed, May 20, 2015
On 21 May 2015 at 16:44, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 21 May 2015 at 09:53, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>>> On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>>> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>>> >> On 20 May 2015
On 21 May 2015 at 09:53, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>> On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>> >> On 20 May 2015 at 06:56, Jerin Jacob
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Wed,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> >> On 20 May 2015 at 06:56, Jerin Jacob
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:12AM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wro
On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>> On 20 May 2015 at 06:56, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:12AM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>> >> On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Ola,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 06:56, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:12AM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> >> On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin
> >> wrote:
> >> > Ola,
> >> >
> >> > Is there any specific reason for follo
On 20 May 2015 at 06:56, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:12AM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>> On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin
>> wrote:
>> > Ola,
>> >
>> > Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ?
>> pa
>> >
>> > diff --git a/test/valid
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:12AM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin wrote:
> > Ola,
> >
> > Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ?
> pa
> >
> > diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c
> > index
On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin wrote:
> Ola,
>
> Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ?
pa
>
> diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c
> index 554b353..724026e 100644
> --- a/test/validation/odp_timer.c
> +++ b/test/valida
Ola,
Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ?
diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c
index 554b353..724026e 100644
--- a/test/validation/odp_timer.c
+++ b/test/validation/odp_timer.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void handle_tmo(odp_
10 matches
Mail list logo