On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:39 PM Joseph Seigh wrote:
>
> rseq? The concept seems vaguely familiar. :)
Yes, I meant mostly that it can now be played with easily and used in
production.
> Might not get past POC w/ smrproxy. The idea was to write portable code
> using c11/c17 atomics but I
rseq? The concept seems vaguely familiar. :)
Might not get past POC w/ smrproxy. The idea was to write portable code
using c11/c17 atomics but I don't thing that's possible given how borked
its memory model semantics are. And I mean even more borked than their
discussions of what they
