On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Miral Mirality wrote:
> On 25/11/2016 19:46, "Dmitry Vyukov" wrote:
>> > While uniform licensing is not strictly mandatory in Boost, AFAIK, I
>> > think
>> > technically to include the code in a Boost library would prefer
On 25/11/2016 19:46, "Dmitry Vyukov" wrote:
> > While uniform licensing is not strictly mandatory in Boost, AFAIK, I
think
> > technically to include the code in a Boost library would prefer Dmitry
to
> > allow relicensing it with the Boost license
> >