> Well, the documentation is effectively one of the biggest issue.
> Which version of apr should/can be used, is apr-iconv still needed, and
> so on.
Peeking at http://apr.apache.org/compiling_win32.html this doesn't
seem to be purely a log4cxx problem. It might help to have a
firmly-defined targ
On 18.12.2013 07:02, Alexandru Zbarcea wrote:
> Florian...
>
> Can you be more specific?
>
> I intend to start exactly with this. Current version is based on
> autotools. Is that what you don't like?
>
> Compatibility with you compiler? Some ant tasks that fails?
> Documentation (I think this what
