Re: Project status

Subversion repos are mirrored on GitHub as well; it's just more work involved merging pull requests via svn unless you're already using git-svn locally (at which point I ask, why even use svn in the first place?) On 16 March 2017 at 21:56, Ralph Goers wrote: > Now that the incubator vote has pas

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Oh, I didn't realise I had a response on how to handle that. Let me follow up with infra. On 16 March 2017 at 21:46, Ralph Goers wrote: > Is there any follow-up to this? > > Ralph > > On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > 1. That seems fine to me. > 2. Is it possible to do both?

Re: Project status

Now that the incubator vote has passed we can formally begin the process of moving the project back to Logging Services. Frankly, there isn’t much to do. This list is going to be merged into d...@logging.apache.org along with all the other sub-projects while th

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Is there any follow-up to this? Ralph > On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > 1. That seems fine to me. > 2. Is it possible to do both? I like the idea of annoying the sender but > still allowing the email to be sent. It would cool if it could even add > [list] to the start of

[RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and no other votes. So we will begin the process of moving the project back to Logging Services. Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2