No, the linkage convention for your DLL shouldn't make a difference
unless the log4cxx library is not included. I built a DLL accessed by
Smalltalk just fine, but the log4cxx classes (0.9.7, I'm afraid) were
included in my special DLL rather than being a separate DLL.
Have you specified the log4c
Hello,
I am writing a dynamic library that needs to have its exported
functions declared with the C calling convention. I am getting
unresolved externals for the log4cxx methods/functions which are used
in these functions. The unresolved symbols seem to be mangled names
which is why I am posing th
Curt Arnold schrieb:
On Aug 15, 2005, at 4:32 AM, David Sallge wrote:
Hello!
Thank you very much for your help.
I appreciate it very much that you helped me.
It worked well, VC now recognises log4cxx-classes and functions.
But unfortunately I get a bunch of compile-errors.
VC states that the
