On May 28, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Jeffrey Graham wrote:
Curt,
Thanks for the great info.
I thought that log4cxx would be further along than it is... I am
currently using
log4cpp with it's streams implementation and have been happy with
it; it is thread safe and does not suffer
from mangled bu
On May 29, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Jitendra Kharche wrote:
I am getting the following error
log4cxx: No level could be found named "null".
What could be the reason. The log4cxx.xml file has following
configuration.
I believe this would occur in log4cxx 0.9.7 when logging was being
attempte
I am getting the
following error
log4cxx: No level
could be found named "null".
What could be the
reason. The log4cxx.xml file has following configuration.
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/" debug="false">
Regards,
Jitendra
**