We have been using STLport for about half an year. No problem has been
found so far. BTW, our test shows that the speed using STLport is much
faster than using the original STL package in log4cxx.
Lingyun Tuo
On 3/16/06, Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Renato Cassaca wrote:
We're using log4cxx on both Linux and Windows:1. Linux with GCC 3.2.2;
2. Windows with MSVC6.
Lingyun
On 2/8/06, Diego Susa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
> I've tried log4cxx a year or so ago, because I wanted to use it in my project.
> By that time I couldn't fill my needs of compiler support
Generally speaking, no problem if the target can be built successfully.
Good luck!
Lingyun
On 2/9/06, Stephane Hamel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if it's normal to get C4250 and C4251 warnings ?
>
> Is it safe to ignore them w/ #pragma ?
>
> I compiled CVS head (February 3, 20
ersion
time is not counted. In most cases, this is acceptable.
Lingyun Tuo
On 1/4/06, thinkcenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi , I am newbie to log4cxx. recently I am trying to use log4cxx in
> my project to take place of my owner loger mechanism. but I feels some
> drawbacks
As far as I know, in *nix-like systems, library tool such as "ar" may
be used to combine several libraries together.
Lingyun Tuo
On 1/4/06, Jitendra Kharche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Lingyun,
>
> Thanks for the reply. But there is some more help required.
&
We have been using static libraries of log4cxx in both Windows and
Linux platforms.
Good luck.
Lingyun Tuo
On 1/4/06, Jitendra Kharche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can Log4cxx 0.9.8 be linked statically with all its dependencies like apr,
> apr-util?
> I am
ple carriage return.
We use log4cxx 0.9.7 on Windows 2k.
Thanks in adance.
Lingyun Tuo
