Re: Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk

Thorsten Schöning am-soft.de> writes: > I guess the warnings there are because of your old compiler, that's > something you need to fiddle on your own... The ODBC error may be > removed using "with-ODBC=no", because the default behavior is "auto", > which enables ODBC by default on Windows. The d

Re: Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk

Hi Thorsten, > You need to provide all of the errors I thought I did. I provided a link to the complete compile log, with all errors, here: http://pastebin.com/zpKfm7i9 Regarding the problem with XMLPARSEAPI: > No idea currently, only found the following which suggests you are > defining the

Re: Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk

Thorsten Schöning am-soft.de> writes: > > Guten Tag ToddA, > am Sonntag, 7. September 2014 um 02:32 schrieben Sie: > > > I had used TortoiseSVN Repository Browser to download trunk and didn't > > realize it would be incomplete. > > It normally isn'

Re: Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk

Just to clarify, after I did 'svn checkout' on my Linux box I transferred the etnire contents to Win XP. I'm still doing the build on Win XP and not Linux.

Re: Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk

Thorsten Schöning am-soft.de> writes: > > Guten Tag ToddA, > am Mittwoch, 3. September 2014 um 07:43 schrieben Sie: > > > (I hope it's not > > a problem that I'm using the latest version of Maven, 3.x, and not 2.x as > > listed in this URL.) >

Re: Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk

Thorsten Schöning am-soft.de> writes: > > Guten Tag ToddA, > am Dienstag, 2. September 2014 um 06:13 schrieben Sie: > > > 8. The steps at http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/ say to, "See the cc > > tasks for installation instructions for cpptasks." When

Using VC6 on XP to build log4cxx from latest trunk [was Re: Status of log4cxx under Windows using VS 2010]

Thorsten Schöning am-soft.de> writes: > > Guten Tag ToddA, > am Donnerstag, 28. August 2014 um 07:28 schrieben Sie: > > > Can you clarify what you mean by "shouldn't be necessary"? > > It shouldn't be necessary to use ANT to create VS proj

Re: Status of log4cxx under Windows using VS 2010

Thorsten Schöning am-soft.de> writes: > > Guten Tag Joseph Fradley, > am Dienstag, 18. März 2014 um 18:11 schrieben Sie: > > > Thank you. Is Ant the preferred way to build log4cxx? I don't see the VS project files any more. > > The project files are only part of a release, you can create thos

Re: Problem building log4cxx 0.10.0 -- missing source files?

Hi Thorsten, Thank you for your reply, but after visiting the various links you provided, as a noob I can see it's a /lot/ of work to build from the latest source to be sure I get the latest bug fixes. According to the FAQ on the wiki