Hi All,
I'd like to avoid having to create a logstream definition in every function
that needs it.
Is there any way to create a logstream in the header and then attach it to
a logger in the constructor?
based on what I'm seeing there is not.
thanks,
Lucas
> I'd like to avoid having to create a logstream definition in every function
> that needs it.
> Is there any way to create a logstream in the header and then attach it to a
> logger in the constructor?
Could you give an example of the code that you're writing that
requires repeatedly explicitly c
Given those comments (thanks for pointing them out), I definitely will not
define logstreams in my headers.
The style of code that I prefer uses iostreams, so for example this type of
log statement:
logstream << Level::getInfo() << "Player started with SYPHON " << SYPHON << ",
FBO " << FBO << ", D
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers,
am Montag, 13. Januar 2014 um 21:26 schrieben Sie:
> logstream << Level::getInfo() << "Player started with SYPHON " <<
> SYPHON << ", FBO " << FBO << ", DEMO " << DEMO << LOG4CXX_ENDMSG;
Isn't there code missing which checks the current level, outputs your
logstream etc
You can macro-up
> logstream << Level::getInfo() << "Player started with SYPHON " << SYPHON <<
> ", FBO " << FBO << ", DEMO " << DEMO << LOG4CXX_ENDMSG;
as
LOG4CXX_INFO(logger, "Player started with SYPHON " << SYPHON <<
", FBO " << FBO << ", DEMO " << DEMO);
out-of-the box. In my own work,
LOG4CXX_INFO(logger, "Player started with SYPHON " << SYPHON << ", FBO
" << FBO << ", DEMO " << DEMO);
This would be exactly the type of syntax that can save me from using
logstreams. Didn't realize I could macro like that.
thanks
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
> You
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers,
am Montag, 13. Januar 2014 um 23:03 schrieben Sie:
> Didn't realize I could macro like that.
It's one of the documented suggested solutions:
> Logging requests are made by invoking a method of a logger instance,
> preferrably through the use of LOG4CXX_INFO or similar ma
:) RTFM I guess
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Lucas Vickers,
> am Montag, 13. Januar 2014 um 23:03 schrieben Sie:
>
> > Didn't realize I could macro like that.
>
> It's one of the documented suggested solutions:
>
> > Logging requests are made by invoking
