Hi Allen,
Conway Allen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> You used to be able to pick up log4cxx here
> http://littletux.homelinux.org/log4cxx/log4cxx-0.9.8.tar.gz but you
> couldn’t today, and no doubt you haven’t been able to for a while. Where
as Vijai wrote, the correct filename ist
http://littletux.ho
On Nov 14, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Vijai Kalyan wrote:
There is a log4cxx-0.10.0.tar.gz available in that dir. Is there
any reason why the build number might have been incremented?
Yes, 0.9.8 implies binary compatibility with 0.9.7 which wasn't the
case. The forthcoming version will be 0.10
There is a log4cxx-0.10.0.tar.gz available in that dir. Is there any reason why the build number might have been incremented?
On 11/14/06, Conway Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
You used to be able to pick up log4cxx here
http://littletux.homelinux.org/log4cxx/log4cxx-0.9.8.tar.gz but
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
KanwisherSent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:52 AMTo:
Log4CXX UserSubject: Re: log4cxx-0.9.8 release
mode
Look at the ant script that comes with the build, it clearly has an
option to do debug or release builds. Its really easy if you edit the file
Look at the ant script that comes with the build, it clearly has an option to do debug or release builds. Its really easy if you edit the file but I think you can even pass it on the command line
On 4/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had to build the release version myse
I had to build the release version myself from the SVN
head. You have to grab some source for a few other jar files and build
those as well. Schedule a little time for yourself to get it done - it's
not just a click of a button away. The good news is that once you've gone
through the pain
Labour, Matthieu (MLPRO SF) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the latest log4cxx-0.9.8 from
> http://littletux.homelinux.org/log4cxx/
>
> When I run ./autogen.sh
It should usually not be necessary to run autogen,
because the tarball at
http://littletux.homelinux.org/log4cxx/log4cxx-0.9.8.tar.gz
already con
unzipped/untarred, set the classpath, ant, and
everything built and tested fine.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:13 AM
To: Combes, Chris M.
Cc: Log4CXX User
Subject: Re: Log4cxx-0.9.8
Hi Chris.
I've had a similar problem...
Maybe my solution works for you:
--- ---
Hi to all!
As noone had an idea, I fixed this myself.
Perhaps someone needs this solution, too, that's why I'm posting it.
It's quite simple:
In VS 7, when doing a MFC project, goto project - project properties.
Hi,
which source tree did you use, the SVN head or the one at
http://www.littletux.net/log4cxx ?
I just recompiled the dist-tarball
from http://www.littletux.net/log4cxx/log4cxx-0.9.8.tar.gz
using Visual Studio .NET which succeeded fine.
See http://www.littletux.net/log4cxx/log4cxx-0.9.8_win32.zi
Title: log4cxx 0.9.8
Hmm, windows is simple.
Install ANT and run ant.
On the other two, I would again install
ANT, and strongly suggest GCC.
From: news on behalf of balaSent: Tue
9/27/2005 10:36 AMTo:
log4cxx-user@logging.apache.orgSubject: log4cxx
0.9.8
I need to compile log4
11 matches
Mail list logo
