ess is being conflated with the notion of pointee constness.
Surely the above example is not such an unreasonable a thing to expect to be
able to do? :)
BTW, I wasn't sure whether this was more appropriate for the user list or
the dev list (I'm subscribed to both).
Scott McCaskill
On Nov 7, 2007 5:10 PM, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Scott McCaskill wrote:
>
> > I've noticed the const version of this method is returning a
> > pointer to const. The reason this is a problem is that it makes it
> >
