> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Anyone interested in adding version support for LoggingEvent
> > serialization?
> > > Currently, the sending side and the receiving side of a LoggingEvent have
> > > to have the same fields. If a field is added or if a field is removed in
> > > LoggingEvent from one log4j
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Saturday, November 17, 2001, at 12:24 AM, Robert Bushman wrote:
>
> > Well, rather than adding fuel to the fire, why
> > don't I take a crack at the native Java version,
> > then if the XML version is better, or mine
> > doesn't work out, no
If you're running Log4cpp, Can you post a comprehensive
copy of a serialized C++ LoggingEvent somewhere where I
can download it?
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Leathers, Burton wrote:
> Another thing to bear in mind in the serialization discussion is the need to
> have a 'logging event consolidator' which
Another thing to bear in mind in the serialization discussion is the need to
have a 'logging event consolidator' which receives messages from both Java
and C++ senders. This is a problem I will soon face and I would be more than
happy to have someone else solve the problem for me.
Burton
-Or
On Saturday, November 17, 2001, at 12:24 AM, Robert Bushman wrote:
> Ahh, OK, thanks for the background.
>
> Well, rather than adding fuel to the fire, why
> don't I take a crack at the native Java version,
> then if the XML version is better, or mine
> doesn't work out, no harm done, you can ju
