Re: Interesting thread about commons-digester and other component s

At 22:00 16.05.2002 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: >>Yes, I have given it some thought. Although the hierarchical rules >>extension of the digester model is cool (hey it's my idea), I am trying >>to find ways of sticking to the original digester model and not >>introducing hierarchical R

Re: Interesting thread about commons-digester and other component s

On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 09:12 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > At 20:28 16.05.2002 +0100, you wrote: >> you're not bothered about not supporting the most popular digester rules >> since you'd expect people to creating their own custom rules. > > Yes. I find it much quicker and safer to write a n

Re: Interesting thread about commons-digester and other component s

At 20:28 16.05.2002 +0100, you wrote: >On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 10:04 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > > >>We almost certainly do not need BeanPropertySetterRule in any case its a >>variant of SetPropertyRule. As for SetTopRule, SetRootRule, SetNextRule, >>CallMethodRule, although very generic, i

Re: Interesting thread about commons-digester and other component s

On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 10:04 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > We almost certainly do not need BeanPropertySetterRule in any case its a > variant of SetPropertyRule. As for SetTopRule, SetRootRule, SetNextRule, > CallMethodRule, although very generic, imho they make it harder to follow > and u

SocketAppender and LoggingEvent

Hi, I am getting log4j.spi.LoggingEvents via the log4j.net.SocketAppender and log4j.net.SimpleSocketServer which is working pretty well except I can't actually tell which host the messages came from. I'll set the scene first, and put some questions down the bottom. I subclassed PatternParser

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9155] New: - LoggingEvent.getMDCCopy() should set mdcLookupRequired = false

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Did someone sign up log4j-dev in BugZilla?

> Yes, I did. [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be the initial > owner of log4j bug reports. This will make it easier for > developers to follow the handling of bug reports. Fair enough - but presumably that means you *don't* want the password mail to be accepted? :) Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Did someone sign up log4j-dev in BugZilla?

Hi Jon, Yes, I did. [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be the initial owner of log4j bug reports. This will make it easier for developers to follow the handling of bug reports. Cheers, Ceki At 10:26 16.05.2002 +0100, you wrote: >I've just had a moderation email from BugZilla, with a password for >[EMAIL

Did someone sign up log4j-dev in BugZilla?

I've just had a moderation email from BugZilla, with a password for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did anyone here sign it up, and if so, why? Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: