DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9592] New: - Logger.getLogger(String, LoggerFactory) caching bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: More Filter Thoughts

I hate to be pedantic but ChainableFilterBase is a bad name because the o.a.log4j.spi.Filter class is already "ChainableFilterBase." The o.a.log4j.spi.Filter class is an abstract class supporting precisely the "chainable filter" behavior. It is also a "base" class because all filters derive from

Re: TRACE level

No, a TRACE level is not being considered. At 12:51 03.06.2002 -0500, you wrote: >Before I subclass the level class and add in a TRACE level, is there any >chance log4j will add in a TRACE level? > > >I really see the need to have a TRACE level that just details path of the >program without clut

RE: TRACE level

I'll save you some programming: public class TraceLevel extends Level { public static final int TRACE_INT = 800; // We assimilate TRACE to DEBUG on Syslog private static final int SYSLOG_TRACE_INT = 7; public static final TraceLevel TRACE = new TraceLevel(TRACE_INT, "TRACE", SYSLO

TRACE level

Before I subclass the level class and add in a TRACE level, is there any chance log4j will add in a TRACE level? I really see the need to have a TRACE level that just details path of the program without cluttering up the DEBUG level output. Sean. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: More Filter Thoughts

I propose the following: - new, changed filters under the package name o.a.log4j.filters - In this package, a new abstract base class, ChainableFilterBase.java. This will be a base class that supports a property, ChainPolicy, and a decide() method that uses it's setting. ChainPolicy will support