RE: CVS/SSH on Windows

2002-06-24 Thread Sean Reilly
Assuming you're using PuTTY for the SSH part then I would recommend using either: a) the native win32 cvs command line tool, which is available at http://www.cvshome.org/downloads.html or b) TortoiseCVS: a graphical Explorer extension, which is available at http://www.tortoisecvs.org/ Both of

RE: CVS/SSH on Windows

2002-06-24 Thread Mark Womack
I am using the tools that were suggested in the Apache pages (I forget where exactly): Putty (for SSH access) and WinCVS for cvs access. Seems to work fine. -Mark > -Original Message- > From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: CVS/SSH on Windows

2002-06-24 Thread Jon Skeet
> I use the CVS/SSH combination that is delivered with Cygwin > on Windows to access the jakarta-log4j module in read/write mode. > Cygwin is a unix-like > environment that runs under Windows. What do other comitters > use to access the jakarta-log4j cvs module in read/write mode? [I'm not a

RE: CVS/SSH on Windows

2002-06-24 Thread Jim Moore
Also use Cygwin for CVS/SSH. Also failed miserably trying to get WinCVS to do it. -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CVS/SSH on Windows Hi all, I use the CVS/SSH combination that is deliv

CVS/SSH on Windows

2002-06-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hi all, I use the CVS/SSH combination that is delivered with Cygwin on Windows to access the jakarta-log4j module in read/write mode. Cygwin is a unix-like environment that runs under Windows. What do other comitters use to access the jakarta-log4j cvs module in read/write mode? By the way,

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/config ConfigWatchdog.java

2002-06-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
I should have replied to this much earlier. It looks good. :-) At 06:39 16.06.2002 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >mwomack 2002/06/15 23:39:27 > > Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/config ConfigWatchdog.java > Log: > Added interface for ConfigWatchdog. > > Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10185] - AsyncAppender.close() does not call close() on attached appenders

2002-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10185] New: - AsyncAppender.close() does not call close() on attached appenders

2002-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Small Bug + Fix in LogBrokerMonitor.java

2002-06-24 Thread BMarlborough
Hi Mike, Thanks for the catch. You are right, the URL is wrong. I must have miss typed the URL path when I was converting the LF5 source code to fit into the Log4j hierarchy. Pesky hardcoded Strings!! It should be: URL newIconURL = cl.getResource("org/apache/log4j/lf5/viewer/" + "ima

Re: Buffered IO

2002-06-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 16:07 24.06.2002 +0200, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: >FYI, here are somewhat related papers of performance-oriented colleagues: > >Dynamic Monitoring of High-Performance Distributed Applications, D. >Gunter, B. Tierney, K. Jackson, J. Lee, M. Stoufer, Proceedings of the >11th IEEE Symposium on Hig

Re: Buffered IO

2002-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Hoschek
FYI, here are somewhat related papers of performance-oriented colleagues: Dynamic Monitoring of High-Performance Distributed Applications, D. Gunter, B. Tierney, K. Jackson, J. Lee, M. Stoufer, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC-11, July 2002,

Re: Buffered IO

2002-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Hoschek
>In early 2002, a user (I can't find the name since Bugzilla is down) >filed a bug report claiming that on a heavily used server machine >adding buffered IO to FileAppender gave a perceptible boost to logging >performance. As a response we added buffered IO to FileAppender. Perhaps you are refe

Buffered IO

2002-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Hoschek
>In early 2002, a user (I can't find the name since Bugzilla is down) >filed a bug report claiming that on a heavily used server machine >adding buffered IO to FileAppender gave a perceptible boost to logging >performance. As a response we added buffered IO to FileAppender. Perhaps you are refe