Chainsaw patch - Create Main Window in ChainsawAppender

2003-03-11 Thread mwomack
Here is a patch that moves the creation of the Main Chainsaw window from the Start class to the ChainsawAppender class. It gets created in the activateOptions() method of the ChainsawAppender class. I wanted to float this patch before applying it in cvs. - This is very much like the way LF5 work

RE: Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread Paul Smith
> refer to. I would suggest the wiki area as a good place > (http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPage s). I'll go an update the Todo since the Chainsaw appender->Receiver model is effectively done, and add an overview of the the features Scott has in his code (since I woul

RE: Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread mwomack
> I've been working on the tab pane UI - which isn't released because it > needs cleaned up and it includes the column sorting code provided by > Claude Duguay and I haven't been told the T's have been crossed and the > I's dotted. Scott, I guess your submission might hinge on this detail. I saw

RE: Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread Oliver Burn
I can only agree with the sentiments expressed below. The last thing Log4J needs is yet another log viewer. Personally I would rather see Chainsaw modified to include the changes you have described, or Chainsaw is completely replaced. But definitely not another viewer. One of the things Chainsaw h

RE: Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread mwomack
> Perhaps the log4j community needs to formalise some sort of "feature > requirements" for Chainsaw through discussion, and prioritise those on a > release schedule basis. Once the requirements are ok-ed by the dev (and > even the users themselves! :) ) community, then portions of everyone's > res

RE: Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread mwomack
Scott, It sounds like you have been a very busy beaver. I think we are all salivating at the prospect of seeing what you have done. A picture would speak a thousand words, and actual jar files would speak volumes. Regarding creating a new tool vs integrating with Chainsaw, it can go either way.

RE: Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread Paul Smith
Hi Scott, comments in-line (I'm no committer, so treat with grain of salt, or less). > Chainsaw takes up a good amount of space with the filtering panel and > I've moved that functionality primarily to a popup. I agree that it takes up some screen real estate that would be more useful for the l

Tab pane UI status

2003-03-11 Thread Scott Deboy
I've been working on the tab pane UI - which isn't released because it needs cleaned up and it includes the column sorting code provided by Claude Duguay and I haven't been told the T's have been crossed and the I's dotted. I wanted to let the group know what I've been doing and get some feedback

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17887] - RollingFileAppender does not work for 10 threads

2003-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17887] New: - RollingFileAppender does not work for 10 threads

2003-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17862] New: - Version.getVersion() method requested

2003-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu