[snip]
>> Does someone want to pursue this line with Chainsaw? I think
>> we should
>> create something/prove its usefulness before requesting Apache/Jakarta
>> infrastructure changes.
>
> That's a sound approach. I wouldn't mind doing the effort for Web
> Start, but it does pose two issues:
>
>
> Well, I would imagine we could get the jnlp MIME type added
> to the conf file
> on the Jakarta Apache server...:-)
One would certainly hope it isn't too much effort for the guy's and gals.
>
> Does someone want to pursue this line with Chainsaw? I think
> we should
> create something/prove
Well, I would imagine we could get the jnlp MIME type added to the conf file
on the Jakarta Apache server...:-)
Does someone want to pursue this line with Chainsaw? I think we should
create something/prove its usefulness before requesting Apache/Jakarta
infrastructure changes. If nothing else, w
> What is required to host them? Just put the jars somewhere internet
> accessible? It has been a while since I looked at Java Web
> Start, but it
> didn't seem too complicated at the time.
>
> -Mark
Have to modify the MIME types on the server to add the .jnlp (Java Network
Launch Protocol), a
What is required to host them? Just put the jars somewhere internet
accessible? It has been a while since I looked at Java Web Start, but it
didn't seem too complicated at the time.
-Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:
> It sounds like a good start to me. This tool is a definite sandbox
> contender.
And another candidate for Java Web Start! What's Apache's policy on hosting
Web start apps? Are the current servers configured to host them? Is any
Jakarta project using them?
cheers,
Paul Smith
--
> I thought I'd just through out there a little status update.
> I've written
> the bulk of the "rough draft" of the configuration gui guts.
> I'm working
> on the windows right now. Unfortunately, my work situation is
> deteriorating rapidly, which is occupying a tremendous amount
> of my
At 12:24 PM 3/24/2003 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to provide explicit ConfigPanels per appender primarily to
provide a mechanism for 3rd party/propriety code to provide a custom,
pretty gui. I've also found that generic gui's are usually harder for end
user's to understand and use th
Hey Ceki,
>I'd switch 2 and 1.
>
>Rationale: Explicit directives by the user should override implicit
rules.
Doh! Of course - switching 1 and 2 :-$
>However, if the DefaultConfigPanel is powerful enough, then there may be
no
>need for explicit ConfigPanels per appender.
I wanted to provide
Hi Richard,
Here are my (very) quick comments.
At 11:11 AM 3/24/2003 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I'd just through out there a little status update. I've written
the bulk of the "rough draft" of the configuration gui guts. I'm working
on the windows right now. Unfortunately, my wo
I thought I'd just through out there a little status update. I've written
the bulk of the "rough draft" of the configuration gui guts. I'm working
on the windows right now. Unfortunately, my work situation is
deteriorating rapidly, which is occupying a tremendous amount of my time.
I hope th
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 07:17 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
LoggingEvent has too much baggage - ThrowableInfo, LocationInfo - why
aren't these just properties of the event? That would fit better with
other languages that don't support throwables or provide an equivalent to
LocationInfo. Th
Hi Scott,
I will be getting these changes (or similar supporting changes) into cvs.
I'll see what I can do tonight or tomorrow night.
thanks!
-Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 9:41 AM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subj
Howdy,
If there is some help needed with configuration of either jalopy or checkstyle, I'll
be glad to help. Sorry for contributing the original tasks to the log4j build.xml and
then disappearing ;) An unexpected moved up deadline at work.
To someone else's point: I've found that running chec
14 matches
Mail list logo
