Oops... sorry. Guess I need to place a mail filter on [VOTE]... ;)
I vote yes.
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christopher Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 200
If it's still got backwards compatibility... cool.
No reservations here.
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:08 AM
Subject: [POLL] Renamed classes
Hello all,
As my recent CVS commits indicate,
Just thought I had to get that in there... ;)
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Revised API Proposal
> > P.S. Logger could also be someone w
Speaking of documentation, that brings up a good point:
- If we change the class to "Logger", the docs need to be changed
- What about the configuration file structure? Do we leave them as
"categories", or rename them "loggers"? If we change it over to loggers, it
doesn't make sense: "com.java_
;);
In the first, it reads as "Log an error of 'Bad thing happened'." The
second way reads as, what?, "Categorize an error of 'Bad thing happened'"?
You can get it back to that your sending an error to a category in the
logging package, but why should you hav
Well, it's easy to change a set of import statements in your applications
(org.log4j to org.apache.log4j) plus if I remember correctly, changing
the package name was a requirement from the Apache folks.
IMHO, I wasn't too sure about changing from Category to Logger... Category
is the more int
et, MCSD, MCDBA
> VersatileSolutions
> p: 502-551-8423
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: LOG
Kevin,
I'm testing the code right now, but I made a couple of small additions to
your UDP code:
- Check if the InetAddress is a MulticastAddress. If so, create a
MulticastSocket instead and join
the group
- During cleanup, try and cast the DatagramSocket to a MulticastSocket. If
it works, leav
Hi James,
In the FAQ (the committed one, not the one on the website), there's a
suggstion to try the following in your Servlet:
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResource("log4j.properties
");
And see if you get null back. If you get the URL back correctly, then
you're probably
I agree that we should probably move to Java 2 only in the future, but I
could make two changes to my submission that would let us continue running
under Java 1:
Change 1- Change the following code in VersionHelper to dynamically load the
VersionHelper20 class. This means that VersionHelper woul
Sorry... I forgot to add the helpers to
the package name of the class load.
-Chris
VersionHelper.java
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doh! Thanks for pointing that out... the revised code is attached.
Late night coding... :)
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Michael McCauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'LOG4J Developers Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:15 AM
Subject: RE: [Update] source
That's a good idea... the code would be similar, except we'd catch
SecurityException instead of ClassNotFoundException.
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Kristensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:39 AM
Sub
rds, Ceki
At 01:34 16.06.2001 -0700, Christopher Taylor wrote:
>I've made the needed changes to Log4J to make sure class are loaded
properly
>using ContextClassLoader on Java 2 platforms.
>
>The changes are attached.
>
>-Chris
>
>-
e can of course remove this
requirement. I'd like to move to JDK 1.2 but I am not sure our user base
would appreciate. By the way, it is easier for a reviewer to study your
changes if you submit your contribution in "diff -u" format. Cheers,
CekiAt 01:34 16.06.2001 -0700, Christ
ry
about the jdk version. It does seem like classloading is becoming a
bigger issue these days. We've been having similar types of problems
with other vendors/products.
Thanks,
Gray
- Original Message -
From:
Christopher
Taylor
To:
Long-term, we could use Sun's proposed JAXB
http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxb/index.html:
JAXB (previously known as Project
Adelard) provides an API and tools that automate the mapping between XML
documents and Java objects.
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Glezen" <[EMA
You got mine right. ;)
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Glezen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Log4j Speech
I'd be grateful for help in pronunciation. I've included my best guesses
bel
+1 from me.
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Kristensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "log4j-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jim Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: [VOTE] new committer Jim Moore
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose that Jim is given comm
19 matches
Mail list logo
