to this list with the subject
PATCH, or [PATCH], and then include in the message the three diff -c
outputs?
Is this kind of functionality useful to others?
Is this the approach I should be taking when proposing changes?
Thanks in advance.
Doug
-
log4j.category.=
or
log4j.category.=,
--- AMIT BHUTRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> How do i set Level for a category from a .properties
> file?
>
> Like, to associate an appender RollingFileApender to
> category R, we add
> following line to the .properties file..
>
>
log4j.appender.R=o
well said. the Logger -> Category change is quite
significant and raised some concerns of mine as well.
--- John Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fully agree with the points you make - and thank
> you for clarifying the
> expected lifecycle of log4j.
>
> Unfortunately your answer doesn'
that would be nice. what we did instead was:
Enumeration iterator =
Category.getRoot().getAllAppenders();
if (!iterator.hasMoreElements())
{
BasicConfigurator.configure();
}
--- Endre_Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A method for asking whether the log4j system is
> configured woul
anyone?
--- doug b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> first, we are using 1.1.4 and we also have seen the
> problem where the rollover doesn't occur if the
> program isn't running when the time change occurs.
> a
> search showed the statement that this was fixed in
&g
rely
different from the DailyRollingFileAppender. is this
a capability that someone has already written? has it
been requested before? would it be worthwhile to fold
into the DailyRollingFileAppender?
thanks for any thoughts.
-doug
__
Do You Yahoo
posted this to the user's group, but got no responses:
--
is there any reason not to make the default
initialization code, from the Category static
initializer, available as a public static method?
(for now, i've copied that static block into my
