I suggest that all public discussion concerning the Logging Services
projects be held on the newly created
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
---
At 12:01 AM 12/19/2003 -0700, Tad E Smith wrote:
Ceki,
I'm interested, but I have to ask the question. What does this mean to
me? It's not clear
to me what role would be and how much effort would be involved. Not to
mention any
code changes that would be required.
Hi Tad,
It would mean that
I would welcome any proposal that outlines a concrete integration
path for LogKit.
At 01:15 AM 12/15/2003 +0100, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Ceki :
One item you may want to add is the inclusion of the Avalon LogKit package
in the list of products under the "rationalization" effort. I think this
w
Ceki :
One item you may want to add is the inclusion of the Avalon LogKit
package in the list of products under the "rationalization" effort. I
think this would be very helpful in terms of moving Avalon closer to a
common logging strategy.
Cheers, Steve.
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hello,
This messa
On 13 Dec 2003, at 02:26, Jacob Kjome wrote:
At 03:49 PM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
You raise interesting questions. The licensing wars are indeed getting
tiresome. Nevertheless, qualifying the Apache license as viral is
highly inaccurate. The ASF asks you to adopt the Apache Software
License i
At 03:49 PM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
You raise interesting questions. The licensing wars are indeed getting
tiresome. Nevertheless, qualifying the Apache license as viral is
highly inaccurate. The ASF asks you to adopt the Apache Software
License if you decide to live under its roof. That is t
You raise interesting questions. The licensing wars are indeed getting
tiresome. Nevertheless, qualifying the Apache license as viral is
highly inaccurate. The ASF asks you to adopt the Apache Software
License if you decide to live under its roof. That is the rule.
The proposal was for the Logging
At 12:34 PM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Please note that joining the Logging Services project would
necessarily mean changing your existing license to the Apache Software
License.
I know licences like GPL and LGPL have been said to be "viral", but isn't
Apache being a bit viral? The Apache point
Hello,
This message is to inform you that we, the log4j developers, are
actively considering the creation of a top level Apache project
offering a wide-range of cross-language Logging Services.
You are invited to join the discussion at the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list. You can also follow the th
