DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: New feature request: Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

It sounds like a nice feature to me. As an RFE to the RFE, I'd like to see an option to cap the amount of data in the buffer. My use case being that when I come across an ERROR or WARN statement, I'm only interested in the logging messages that led up to it. A circular buffer to hold the cache

[GUMP@lsd]: logging-log4j/log4j-tests failed

ant-xalan2.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/data3/gump/dist/junit/junit.jar:/data3/gump/logging-log4j/log4j-lf5-20040505.jar:/data3/gump/logging-log4j/log4j-chainsaw-20040505.jar:/data3/gump/logging-log4j/log4j-200405

Re: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/help Tutorial.java

Thanks Paul. At 12:45 AM 5/5/2004, you wrote: psmith 2004/05/04 15:45:04 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/receivers ReceiversPanel.java src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LogUI.java ChainsawAppenderHandler.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Web start app & Certificates - redux

> Note that "thawtepersonalfreemailca" is on the list... Yup, that's how we got Chainsaw working internally. I had to sign the dependant jars too (so I signed the ORO jars needed by Chainsaw). I however registered my "lawlex.com.au" email address, which is not something someone outside our busi

RE: Web start app & Certificates - redux

At 12:05 AM 5/5/2004, Paul Smith wrote: > But will the ASF sign a certificate we present to them? Do they need to? If you Ceki had, say, your own personal certificate (based on "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or even "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", you can get these free that are valid within the standard certificate c