Re: [Fwd: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice]

2005-07-29 Thread Jacob Kjome
At 12:21 PM 7/29/2005 -0500, you wrote: > >On Jul 29, 2005, at 11:43 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: > >Looking at the 1.2 code it appears that it already tries to just warn >the user if it encounters a validation error. Is there a problem >(other than a warning) that appears when there is non-ID value us

Re: [Fwd: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice]

2005-07-29 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 29, 2005, at 11:43 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: On Jul 29, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Jacob Kjome wrote: Of course, we could release a modified version of the DTD in Log4j-1.2.12 with the "name" attribute not declared as of type "id". Thoughts? Using a type ID for name was not a good choice, b

Re: [Fwd: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice]

2005-07-29 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 29, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Jacob Kjome wrote: Of course, we could release a modified version of the DTD in Log4j-1.2.12 with the "name" attribute not declared as of type "id". Thoughts? Using a type ID for name was not a good choice, but I don't think we can change it. If anybody was u

Re: [Fwd: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice]

2005-07-29 Thread Jacob Kjome
Quoting Raymond DeCampo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Anybody know if the claims below have any merit? This is from a post on > comp.lang.programmer. > I'm not completely sure about all the workings of JULI, but yes, if you use Logj4-1.2.xx, then you need to use the .properties format for Tomcat. The

RE: [Fwd: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice]

2005-07-29 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, It's true Tomcat 5.5.7 and later (not all 5.5.x releases) come with JULI, a tiny library Remy put in place to do away with the logging configuration difficulties. It's true that JULI should be configured with a properties file. But, as the documentation (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomca

[Fwd: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice]

2005-07-29 Thread Raymond DeCampo
Anybody know if the claims below have any merit? This is from a post on comp.lang.programmer. Thanks, Ray Original Message Subject: Re: Logging Strategy/best practice Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:06:24 +0300 From: A_Wieminer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Elisa Internet custo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35893] - Loader.getResource has broken compatibility with Log4J 1.1

2005-07-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu