DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34883] - Conditional SLF4J builds based on slf4j binary releases

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34883] - Conditional SLF4J builds based on slf4j binary releases

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: 1.2.12 Status

2005-08-05 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, > > I was a bit surprised to see HISTORY.txt having separate entries for > > log4j 1.2.12-rc1 and rc2 since those builds don't have the > > endorsement of the the project and will never be part of the official > > history of log4j. In the next build, I'd wrap all the chances since > > 1.2.11

RE: 1.2.12 Status

2005-08-05 Thread Mark Womack
> I was a bit surprised to see HISTORY.txt having separate entries for > log4j 1.2.12-rc1 and rc2 since those builds don't have the > endorsement of the the project and will never be part of the official > history of log4j. In the next build, I'd wrap all the chances since > 1.2.11 into one entry

Re: 1.2.12 Status

2005-08-05 Thread Curt Arnold
On Aug 5, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Mark Womack wrote: I am going to build rc3 this weekend. We should treat that version as the final release candidate and move forward with final release, hopefully by the middle of next week. If there are any concerns or issues, now is the time. Thanks, -Mark

1.2.12 Status

2005-08-05 Thread Mark Womack
I am going to build rc3 this weekend. We should treat that version as the final release candidate and move forward with final release, hopefully by the middle of next week. If there are any concerns or issues, now is the time. Thanks, -Mark -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36049] New: - Prefix constants in PropertyConfigurator should be public

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu