cvs commit: logging-log4j build.properties.sample

carnold 2005/08/18 20:23:18 Modified:.Tag: v1_2-branch build.properties.sample Log: Bug 36268: Update build.properties.sample to reflect current best versions Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.2.2.5 +10 -11

cvs commit: logging-log4j build.xml

carnold 2005/08/18 20:22:26 Modified:.Tag: v1_2-branch build.xml Log: Bug 36268: Add clean-site target Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.34.2.32 +19 -5 logging-log4j/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

cvs commit: logging-log4j/docs HISTORY.txt

carnold 2005/08/18 18:02:05 Modified:.Tag: v1_2-branch build.xml docs Tag: v1_2-branch HISTORY.txt Log: Bug 36268: Add 'release' target to build.xml Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.34.2.31 +

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36268] New: - Add "release" target to build.xml to specify stricter build for public releases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36267] - No property for jndi.jar in build.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/docs HISTORY.txt

carnold 2005/08/18 17:34:49 Modified:.Tag: v1_2-branch build.properties.sample build.xml docs Tag: v1_2-branch HISTORY.txt Log: Bug 36267: Add jndi.jar property to build.xml Revision ChangesPath No revision No

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36267] New: - No property for jndi.jar in build.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests build.xml

carnold 2005/08/18 17:26:51 Modified:testsTag: v1_2-branch build.xml Log: Bug 35831: parameterized javac target and source like Ant, switched default source to 1.1 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.16.2.12 +5 -2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36262] - o.a.l.chainsaw.LoggingReceiver does not compile with JDK 1.1 or 1.2 javac's

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35831] - log4j 1.2 does not build on JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j build.xml

carnold 2005/08/18 17:17:19 Modified:.Tag: v1_2-branch build.xml Log: Bug 35831: parameterized javac target and source like Ant, switched default source to 1.1 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.34.2.29 +15 -12

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36213] - Missing HTML docs (chainsaw, lf5, others), broken link

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/xdocs documentation.xml plan.xml srtw.xml

carnold 2005/08/18 16:08:01 Modified:docs Tag: v1_2-branch HISTORY.txt src/xdocs Tag: v1_2-branch documentation.xml plan.xml Removed: src/xdocs Tag: v1_2-branch srtw.xml Log: Bug 36213: Fixed broken links and removed obsolete documentation Revision Chan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36213] - Missing HTML docs (chainsaw, lf5, others), broken link

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32722] - Test coverage analysis

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests build.xml

carnold 2005/08/18 15:25:59 Modified:testsbuild.xml Log: Bug 32722: Extend -Dhaltonfailure=[yes\no] introduced for clover to all junit tests Revision ChangesPath 1.109 +54 -54logging-log4j/tests/build.xml Index: build.xml ==

cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests build.xml

carnold 2005/08/18 15:23:53 Modified:testsTag: v1_2-branch build.xml Log: Bug 32722: Extend -Dhaltonfailure=[yes\no] introduced for clover to all junit tests Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.16.2.11 +23 -23log

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LoggingReceiver.java

carnold 2005/08/18 15:14:46 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw Tag: v1_2-branch LoggingReceiver.java Log: Bug 36262: o.a.l.chainsaw.LoggingReceiver does not compile with JDK 1.1 or 1.2 javac Revision ChangesPath No revis

Open issues in 1.2.12 (was Re: 1.2.12 Experimental Build)

On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Curt Arnold wrote: 1. o.a.l.chainsaw.LoggingReceiver.java does not compile with javac from JDK 1.1 and 1.2. Logged as bug 36262 2. log4j does not compile with jikes due to the @deprecated on org.apache.log4j.spi.LoggerRepository. Slippery. I don't think I im

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36263] New: - org.apache.log4j.chainsaw.LoadXMLAction fails to compile due to gcj bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36262] New: - o.a.l.chainsaw.LoggingReceiver does not compile with JDK 1.1 or 1.2 javac's

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.2.12 Experimental Build

On Aug 18, 2005, at 11:55 AM, Mark Womack wrote: includeAntRuntime was explicitly set to "no" because I DO NOT WANT to include it anymore. I want to explicitly isolate our compilation classpath from whatever might be in your/mine Ant environment. We have defined the exact set of jars (at

RE: 1.2.12 Experimental Build

Hola, I'm flying to Israel this evening for vacation, and email access will be sporadic. I have one comment below: > 3) Added a new jar that has the jndi related classes. > > Because I was now compiling with jdk 1.2, the jndi related classes > were not available (?). So, I added a new propert

RE: 1.2.12 Experimental Build

Comments below. > -Original Message- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:09 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: 1.2.12 Experimental Build > > > On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:31 AM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > I got a chance to play with the 1

Re: 1.2.12 Experimental Build

On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:31 AM, Mark Womack wrote: I got a chance to play with the 1.2 build tonight. Here is what I did: 1) Isolated the build jdk from the Ant runtime jdk. Basically, I added the following attributes to all of the javac tasks: fork="yes" includeAntRuntim