IRC is inherently hierarchical, server->channels->users
This hierachy is easily represented in Chainsaw's logger tree:
server(tab)->channels(top level loggers)->users(child loggers)
So by default, all messages from any room that you have joined will display in
the table.
You can then search or
On Sep 1, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I know it sounds crazy, but it is pretty handy, and it's another
example
of how to write your own receiver:
http://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4j/ChainsawHelp
Could you elaborate on scenarios where it is handy? I'm not sure I
get it.
There
At 03:21 PM 9/1/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi,
>Don't do it. It's a long discussion still under way, a topic of heavy
debate,
>but the safe answer is don't do it. You can join legal-discuss for
specifics.
>If the dependency is optional, i.e. the program will build and run
without the
>LGPL code
Hi,
Don't do it. It's a long discussion still under way, a topic of heavy debate,
but the safe answer is don't do it. You can join legal-discuss for specifics.
If the dependency is optional, i.e. the program will build and run without the
LGPL code, and you specify the LGPL code in the NOTICE fi
I think the ASF's position can best be described as follows:
while(true){
List answers = Arrays.asList(new String[]{"Yes!", "NO!",
"Maybe!", "Ask someone else", "I have no recollection of that
Senator", "On the advice of council I decline to answer"});
int choice = Math.random() % a
Could someone explain ASF's stance on inclusion of LGPL-dependent code
in our repository and distributions? I thought I recalled it was
currently not allowed (only code dependent on Apache/BSD/MIT licenses
could be included).
I was just curious if it would be ok to include the irc receiver in
Cha
Well, so long as my messages don't show up as level ERROR or FATAL. :-)
-Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 12:06 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Chainsaw IRC client?
>
> I know it sounds crazy, but it i
On Sep 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'd like to pass a cloned NDC Stack across an EJB call, but can't
since its
NDC.DiagnosticContext entries are not serializable. Does anybody
see any
potential issues with adding an "implements java.io.Serializable"
to the
D
I know it sounds crazy, but it is pretty handy, and it's another example
of how to write your own receiver:
http://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4j/ChainsawHelp
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:10 AM
To: Log4J Develop
Hi Folks,
I'd like to pass a cloned NDC Stack across an EJB call, but can't since its
NDC.DiagnosticContext entries are not serializable. Does anybody see any
potential issues with adding an "implements java.io.Serializable" to the
DiagnosticContext class (see snip below)?
// ===
On Sep 1, 2005, at 10:10 AM, Jacob Kjome wrote:
Quoting Mark Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Looks like the next version of SLF4J will have Marker's removed
from the
interface (1). Hopefully this will happen in the near future so
that it can be
integrated with Log4j-1.3 before the snapshot re
On Aug 29, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Dan Bush wrote:
Excellent.
On 8/29/05, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan.
Are you aware of SLF4J API which already incorporates a similar
approach?
The same pattern is also in the CVS HEAD. However, I think there is
a better approach. This top
Quoting Mark Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since no one stated a preference, I will plan on a snapshot release. I'll
> do this build sometime early next week which should give us a chance to
> update the cvs head with anything that should be in the snapshot.
>
> If you have any issues, let me kno
Since no one stated a preference, I will plan on a snapshot release. I'll
do this build sometime early next week which should give us a chance to
update the cvs head with anything that should be in the snapshot.
If you have any issues, let me know.
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: "
Quoting K Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for responding to my clarification.
>
> I tried as you suggested.
> I removed setActiveFileName.
> It worked by appending the date with the fileName.
>
> I have one more clarification:
> Is it possible to have a activeFileName with just name and no
Thanks for responding to my clarification.
I tried as you suggested.
I removed setActiveFileName.
It worked by appending the date with the fileName.
I have one more clarification:
Is it possible to have a activeFileName with just name and no date
appended
and the rolled up files must
16 matches
Mail list logo
