RE: JoranConfigurator problems

I agree, but I'm worried about the fact that our user base would rightfully be ticked if we forced them to change something that didn't have to change: terminology vs. semantics. We have a large user base using configs with this terminology - let's not make life difficult on them when we don't

Re: JoranConfigurator problems

At 11:28 PM 9/17/2005 -0700, you wrote: >I've noticed two issues with an xml-based configuration that works fine with >the 1.2.x jars but does not work using log4j 1.3x alpha jars: > >1. An appender that's defined but not referenced is still constructed and >activateOptions is called (the IRC appe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36700] New: - joranconfigurator instantiating unreferenced appender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Log4j [2005/09/18]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned