DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36800] - LocationInfo not valid for TRACE level calls using new Logger methods

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36800] - LocationInfo not valid for TRACE level calls using new Logger methods

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: CachingAppender

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 11:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The attached appender does exactly this job. It caches the last x events > in memory and passes them to other appenders only in case of an logging > event of a defined level (e.g. ERROR). It's a nice idea, but there's some code formatt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36805] - [juli] Request for subproject JULI based on initial version

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

CachingAppender

Hi, I want to share an appender I've written some time ago and that I'm using in many projects. In productive ennvironments logging is often only of interest in case of an error. In that case you need the last x logging events (but not the 10 MB of the last two month). The attached appender does