RE: 1.3 Tasks (and beyond)

2005-12-19 Thread Scott Deboy
I agree with everything on your 1.3 task list. I've always felt that we need to take pains to ensure compatibility at the binary level and with public apis (domconfigurator, etc.). Preventing synchronization-related issues is critical as well. There are other issues we need to resolve as wel

1.3 Tasks (and beyond)

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Womack
As Curt has mentioned, we got together for a little while to talk about 1.3 stuff. I have included the list of tasks we came up between ourselves. I'm sure it is not complete, but gives an idea of some scope. Please feel free to comment and add more as you see it. The one thing that really

Re: Exploration of use of Maven for site generation and build

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Womack
Yeah, we are talking Maven2 here. It appears to be a really big improvement over Maven1. -Mark - Original Message - From: "Scott Heaberlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Log4J Developers List" Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 8:01 AM Subject: Re: Exploration of use of Maven for site gener

Re: Exploration of use of Maven for site generation and build

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Womack
I think, but need to prove, that a Maven2 build will be easier than the Ant version. I agree that getting 1.3 out the door is a higher priority, but updating our documentation is a pretty high item for 1.3 (IMO) and if Maven2 makes this better/easier, then I am willing to make it happen. -Ma

Re: Exploration of use of Maven for site generation and build

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Womack
"Unmaintainable" may be a bit much, but I think it is fair to say that moving to something more modern, like Maven2, could yield some benefits. As Curt mentioned, there are some really nice features around documentation. We need to figure out the options and settings, but I think it has greater

Re: ULogger cannot be resolved to a type

2005-12-19 Thread Curt Arnold
On Dec 19, 2005, at 9:01 PM, Sam Hwang wrote: Hi, At file ComponentBase.java line 25 there is a declaration private ULogger logger; which the compiler alerts 'ULogger cannot be resolved to a type'. How can I find this class ULogger? Thx! That class was unfortunately left out of the alpha7 d

ULogger cannot be resolved to a type

2005-12-19 Thread Sam Hwang
Hi, At file ComponentBase.java line 25 there is a declaration private ULogger logger; which the compiler alerts 'ULogger cannot be resolved to a type'. How can I find this class ULogger? Thx! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37965] - SyslogAppender not compatible between 1.2.x and 1.3

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r357884 - in /logging/log4j/branches/v1_2-branch/tests: build.properties.sample build.xml log4j-coding-convention.xml src/java/org/apache/log4j/VectorErrorHandler.java src/java/org/apache/

2005-12-19 Thread carnold
Author: carnold Date: Mon Dec 19 18:48:09 2005 New Revision: 357884 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357884&view=rev Log: Bug 37965: SyslogAppender not compatible, add 1.2 unit tests Added: logging/log4j/branches/v1_2-branch/tests/log4j-coding-convention.xml logging/log4j/branches/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35452] - 1.3 alpha 7 not compatible with older versions of log4j i.e 1.2.8

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37965] New: - SyslogAppender not compatible between 1.2.x and 1.3

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37864] - Add target to generate binary and source compatibility report

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37960] - Update site generation to Velocity 1.4

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r357730 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: build.properties.sample build.xml src/xdocs/stylesheets/site.vsl

2005-12-19 Thread carnold
Author: carnold Date: Mon Dec 19 09:35:26 2005 New Revision: 357730 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357730&view=rev Log: Bug 37960: Update site generation to velocity 1.4 Added: logging/log4j/trunk/src/xdocs/stylesheets/site.vsl (with props) Modified: logging/log4j/trunk/build.pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37960] New: - Update site generation to Velocity 1.4

2005-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r357722 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: pom.xml src/changes/ src/changes/changes.xml

2005-12-19 Thread carnold
Author: carnold Date: Mon Dec 19 08:30:39 2005 New Revision: 357722 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357722&view=rev Log: Bug 37930: Mods based on feedback from users@maven.apache.org Added: logging/log4j/trunk/src/changes/ logging/log4j/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml Modified: l

Re: Exploration of use of Maven for site generation and build

2005-12-19 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 12:07 AM 12/17/2005, Curt Arnold wrote: Mark Womack, Ron Grabowski (from log4net) and I just recently returned from ApacheCON US 2005. I expect that Mark will be preparing a report on the Birds of a Feather on Monday night, our discussions on a release plan for 1.3 and thoughts on 2.0. One o