Re: log4j write synchronization

On Jul 26, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Michael Gesundheit wrote: Sorry for posting this question here but there is no reference to this issue anywhere I could find. I would expect developers of the code to know the answer. If I have 2 or more threads logging a message can I be sure that each write i

log4j write synchronization

Sorry for posting this question here but there is no reference to this issue anywhere I could find. I would expect developers of the code to know the answer.   If I have 2 or more threads logging a message can I be sure that each write is atomic?   I DID have two write messages creating one in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40117] New: - Homepage does not link to 1.3 docs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40116] New: - Someone fogot a debugging statement in syslogAppender!

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40115] New: - patch for: syslogAppender.setFacility(final int facility)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Alpha 9 release date

Hi, Yes, the site needs to be updated -- this is why we probably shouldn't even put as vague an estimate as "mid " on there ;) As far as timeframe, I would maybe guess the next 6 weeks or so. But that's just my own guess looking at recent discussions and activity -- others I'm sure have thei

RE: Alpha 9 release date

Sure I realize that just want to get idea about timeframe. Unfortunately I'm under pressure of our Marketing Department and need to know :D. BTW, on the official web page you still show mid 2006 as a final release - I guess that should be updated to late 2006. Thanks, Kris -Original Messag

Re: Alpha 9 release date

Hey, We made a promise to our Marketing Department to have it out by today, so we've all been working days and nights the past couple of weeks, but unfortunately... ... just kidding of course. Like most other FOSS projects and virtually all Apache ones, we don't have exact planned release dates.

Alpha 9 release date

Hi, Any idea what is the planned date for the alpha-9 release? Thanks, Kris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue