Re: Logging Domains

2007-03-29 Thread Curt Arnold
On Mar 29, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Your source headers are old-style, they should be modified to be consistent with http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. The copy2license.pl script in committers/tools can be used to fix those up. Do I need to remove the old headers

Re: Tailing capability for VFS log Receiver in Chainsaw

2007-03-29 Thread Isuru Suriarachchi
Hi paul, Yes. The projects are in an approval stage and the mentors are voting for the proposals. So the proposals with highest points will be approved and announced on 11th of April 2007. I think you have already assigned yourself as my mentor. Thanks very much for your interest in this. And als

Re: Logging Domains

2007-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
Your source headers are old-style, they should be modified to be consistent with http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. The copy2license.pl script in committers/tools can be used to fix those up. Do I need to remove the old headers first, or will the tool pick that up? I may p

Logging Domains

2007-03-29 Thread Curt Arnold
On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Paul Smith wrote: I'm still getting failure notices on the sandbox. My previous modification to asf-mailer.conf made SVN notifications go to both log4j-cvs and the non-existent sandbox- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hopefully have fixed that now. Your source headers a

Re: Tailing capability for VFS log Receiver in Chainsaw

2007-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
On 23/03/2007, at 2:26 PM, Isuru Suriarachchi wrote: Hi paul, It seems like you are really busy these days, anyway thank you very much for your interest... ~Isuru Hi Again, not sure exactly about the process from here, I see the GSOC projects are still going through an approval stage,

svn commit: r523866 - in /logging/sandbox/LoggingDomains: generic-src/org/apache/logging/ generic-src/org/apache/logging/domains/ generic-src/org/apache/loggingdomains/ generic-test/org/apache/logging

2007-03-29 Thread psmith
Author: psmith Date: Thu Mar 29 15:55:27 2007 New Revision: 523866 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523866 Log: Renamed packages: * org.apache.loggingdomains -> org.apache.logging.domains * org.apache.log4j.loggingdomains -> org.apache.log4j.domains Added: logging/sandbox/Logg

Fwd: failure notice

2007-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
I'm still getting failure notices on the sandbox. Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 30 March 2007 8:38:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following

svn commit: r523860 - /logging/sandbox/LoggingDomains/LICENSE.txt

2007-03-29 Thread psmith
Author: psmith Date: Thu Mar 29 15:37:59 2007 New Revision: 523860 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523860 Log: Copied LICENSE.txt from another sandbox project Added: logging/sandbox/LoggingDomains/LICENSE.txt - copied unchanged from r523859, logging/sandbox/strictxml/LIC

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

2007-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
Could you add the standard Apache Source Header to the files, plus add the LICENSE and NOTICE? That should be done by the original contributor. Totally forgot about that, thanks for the reminder. I think that org.apache.logging.domain would be preferable to org.apache.loggingdomain. I

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

2007-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
On 30/03/2007, at 1:11 AM, Jacob Kjome wrote: Hi Paul, Are logging domains akin to Markers in the SLF4J/Logback world? I'm in dangerous territory here because I'm really unfamiliar with SLFJ and logback, but having a browse on the logback docs I think there is _some_ overlap, but I thi

Checking that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid email address

2007-03-29 Thread Curt Arnold
Sorry for the noise. Doing a test to see if SVN notifications on Chainsaw are pointed to a valid email address. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

2007-03-29 Thread Curt Arnold
On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Paul Smith wrote: I just committed Revision 523581 to the logging/sandbox, but I got an email bounce saying: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Anyway, the SVN URL to the project (with Eclipse .project settings..) is here: htt

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

2007-03-29 Thread Jacob Kjome
Hi Paul, Are logging domains akin to Markers in the SLF4J/Logback world? Jake Quoting Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I just committed Revision 523581 to the logging/sandbox, but I got an > email bounce saying: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) > > Anyw

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41980] New: - Log4j stop updating log file- version log4j-1.2.8 and log4j-1.2.14

2007-03-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu