Re: juli LogRecord -> LoggingEvent converter

On 03/04/2007, at 3:48 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: There's a Log4jHandler in this thread: http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18978 yeah, well I figured it wasn't _difficult_, I'm just not sure why we never provided one for use by users of log4j. Should I whip one up and put it

Re: Vigilog listing as "Third-party extension"?

On 03/04/2007, at 3:47 PM, Jacob Kjome wrote: I would add this to the download.xml xdocs, but it seems as if my commit rights have been, somehow, revoked. I can log into people.apache.org, but can't seem to check anything in to Log4j using TortoiseSVN. Any ideas? BTW, at such point th

RE: juli LogRecord -> LoggingEvent converter

There's a Log4jHandler in this thread: http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18978 Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsys

Re: Vigilog listing as "Third-party extension"?

I would add this to the download.xml xdocs, but it seems as if my commit rights have been, somehow, revoked. I can log into people.apache.org, but can't seem to check anything in to Log4j using TortoiseSVN. Any ideas? BTW, at such point that I get my commit access back, how do I update the

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

At 07:07 PM 4/2/2007, you wrote: >At some point we can no longer ignore the decision about where 1.3 >should go. > >I am beginning to think that we should scale back 1.3 to be less of >the planned revolution and more of a substantial-update-but- >completely-backward compatible (to a point). > I t

juli LogRecord -> LoggingEvent converter

Has anyone written a java.util.LogRecord converter to a log4j LoggingEvent? Am I missing something or has no-one tried to create a juli Handler that simply converts the LogRecord into a LoggingEvent and posts it into the log4j hierarchy. Sort of a Receiver sucking in logging events into lo

1.3 - A Line in the Sand

At some point we can no longer ignore the decision about where 1.3 should go. I am beginning to think that we should scale back 1.3 to be less of the planned revolution and more of a substantial-update-but- completely-backward compatible (to a point). We can then step back and think way be

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

At 06:10 AM 4/2/2007, you wrote: My understanding of the motivation of "markers" is to provide a mechanism to provide explicit context (for example, IP address of current request) for a logging call which supplements the implicit context extracted from the current thread (contents of MDC and NDC,

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

At 08:01 AM 4/1/2007, Paul Smith wrote: [snip] Now, back to the discussion: Markers appear to allow one to decorate a single Logging event in a point in code with a specific marker, and I'm assuming here that one could come up with some sort of Composite Marker that would allow a single event t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42023] New: - LoggingEvent Message Object is lost upon serialization

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42017] - InstanceAlreadyExistsException using MBean

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42017] - InstanceAlreadyExistsException using MBean

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42017] New: - InstanceAlreadyExistsException using MBean

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Vigilog listing as "Third-party extension"?

Hi, I posted this on the users mailing list, but I probably needed to direct this to the developers, so that is why I do a re-post here. Please look at: http://www.nabble.com/Vigilog-listing-as-%22Third-party-extension%22--tf3490591.html kind regards, Wim -- View this message in context: http