[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

RE: JUL appender

Great! The tests you'd write aren't quite like the tests we've got (at least that I could find), but here is the link to what we have: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/apac he/log4j/ You'd need to use a memoryhandler on the java.util.logging side and assert tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42664] - JUL Appender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: JUL appender

Scott, Ok great, I've added the information and uploaded the code to issue 42664. I don't have unit tests at the moment. If there are any existing unit tests I can read for reference, I'd be happy to provide unit tests for the appender. Any advice where I can find any? thanks. -sagi -Origin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42664] - JUL Appender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: JUL appender

One more thing..if you have unit tests as well that would be even better. Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -Origi

RE: JUL appender

We need the current Apache license added to each source file, Javadoc and comments where appropriate. Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42664] New: - JUL Appender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: JUL appender

Hi Scott, Thanks for the reply. Pls advise before I attach the code: What do you expect (as a convention/requirement) I should prepare along with the code? I'm not too sure about appropriate EULAs, doc convention, etc. thanks. -Original Message- From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: building nteventlogappender.dll?

Hi Curt... This e-mail message, and any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity identified in the alias address of this message and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unautho

RE: Issue in fixing 'tailing' in Chainsaw

I'll look at the patches..it could be some network timeout that needs to be set higher. For future reference, here's a link to the msg on the commons-dev mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=118180358305021&w=2 Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portl

RE: JUL appender

This is the place! If you don't mind creating a bugzilla issue and attaching the appender, it would help us review it (and find it later) Here's the bugzilla link: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Log4j If you don't want to go through that, you could attach to this mailin

JUL appender

Hi all, I'm new to this devlist. I've sent this email once before, but due to some email issues I realize it did not come through. I was thinking of bridging JUL and log4j, so that existing log4j-enabled applications could correctly write to JUL-enabled environments, with the full layout/filter/

Issue in fixing 'tailing' in Chainsaw

Hi Scott and Pual, I tried to fix the bug with tailing on VFSLogFilePatternReceiver according to the method I explained in my previous mail. According to the provided interface of VFS, I think it is the best way of fixing this problem. So I implemented it and tested it under different scenarios.