Bug report for Log4j [2007/06/17]

2007-06-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

svn commit: r548194 - in /logging/log4j/companions/receivers/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/varia: LogFilePatternReceiver.java LogFilePatternReceiverBeanInfo.java

2007-06-17 Thread psmith
Author: psmith Date: Sun Jun 17 20:44:40 2007 New Revision: 548194 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=548194 Log: Added new property 'useCurrentThread' to the BeanInfo class for introspection purposes. Also fixed up white space in variable declaration in LogFilePatternReceiver.java

RE: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion

2007-06-17 Thread Scott Deboy
worth adding to beaninfo? Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -Original Message- From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL

svn commit: r548189 - /logging/log4j/companions/receivers/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/varia/LogFilePatternReceiver.java

2007-06-17 Thread psmith
Author: psmith Date: Sun Jun 17 20:30:49 2007 New Revision: 548189 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=548189 Log: Adds an option that determines whether a new thread, or the existing thread is used to import the events into the Receiver. By default the behaviour remains unchanged with

Re: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion

2007-06-17 Thread Paul Smith
yep, I think that's a required step for all receivers. Thanks Scott. On 18/06/2007, at 1:22 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: Sure--fyi, I vaguely recall needing activateoptions to be ran in a new threadwithout it, chainsaw behaved badly. Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950

RE: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion

2007-06-17 Thread Scott Deboy
Sure--fyi, I vaguely recall needing activateoptions to be ran in a new threadwithout it, chainsaw behaved badly. Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROT

Re: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion

2007-06-17 Thread Paul Smith
isn't it the reverse? I need a synchronous receiver. The current behaviour is async. ? Can I apply my change? On 18/06/2007, at 3:34 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: Sounds like an AsyncReceiver (essentially what Chainsaw is doing under the covers). Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Str

RE: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion

2007-06-17 Thread Scott Deboy
Sounds like an AsyncReceiver (essentially what Chainsaw is doing under the covers). Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com