svn commit: r550391 - in /logging/sandbox/jul-to-log4j-bridge/src: main/java/org/apache/log4j/jul/ test/java/org/apache/log4j/jul/

Author: psmith Date: Sun Jun 24 23:59:19 2007 New Revision: 550391 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550391 Log: Bug 42664 Addition of JULAppender provided by Sagin Mann. * package structure changed slightly * Mapping of jul<->log4j levels handled by the JULLevelConverter interface

RE: JUL appender

Sure. However, I'm having firewall/proxy issues here in the office. I will probably not be able to checkout the code, but I could start by looking at it using a browser… Pls provide the repository link once all is checked in. thanks, Sagi Mann From: Paul

Re: JUL appender

I have got the JULAppender (subtle rename, made it upper case to match the rest of the bridge projects naming conventions) into the bridge project in my local workspace. I've slightly changed the Appender to use the JULLevelConverter interface so that users can customize the Level mapping.

RE: JUL appender

Thanks for the feedback, makes total sense to me as well. Sagi Mann -Original Message- From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 09:44 AM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Re: JUL appender On 25/06/2007, at 4:32 PM, Sagi Mann wrote: I have a few questio

Re: JUL appender

On 25/06/2007, at 4:32 PM, Sagi Mann wrote: I have a few questions: I originally concentrated on ease-of-use as much as possible. I, as Arnold, am concerned that usage will become overly complex. Current use is to treat JulAppender as if it was ConsoleAppender (even replacing any refs to Conso

RE: JUL appender

I have a few questions: I originally concentrated on ease-of-use as much as possible. I, as Arnold, am concerned that usage will become overly complex. Current use is to treat JulAppender as if it was ConsoleAppender (even replacing any refs to ConsoleAppender with JulAppender would work). This w

Bug report for Log4j [2007/06/24]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Retrieve Appender Properties.

Friends, In our applicaiton, we have the log4j_conf.xml and we have different appenders. Now my work is to show these appenders details to the user and allow him to modify and then need to change the modified contents in the XML. My Questions is... How can i get the properties of an appender

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: JUL appender

Answers that I'd be looking for: Are the log4j->jul and jul->log4j solutions symmetric: For example, if there is a JULAppender, is there a corresponding Log4jHandler? The original bridge code dealt with jul->log4j only. The new JULAppender code provide by Sagi Mann is the symmetric equ

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42664] - JUL Appender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

Re: JUL appender

On Jun 24, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Paul Smith wrote: I haven't been tracking the JUL <-> log4j stuff as well as I would like, but there are enough things that I'm unsettled with that I'm not ready to see them in an imminent release. If you're feeling unsettled, I would appreciate it if you coul

Re: JUL appender

On 24/06/2007, at 7:03 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: On Jun 23, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: The test case looks fine. Anyone opposed to me merging this into the 1.2 branch, added to a new org.apache.log4j.jul package. Yes, I am opposed at the moment. log4j 1.2.15's release is i