Bug report for Log4j [2008/02/10]

2008-02-10 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Varargs support to the sandbox

2008-02-10 Thread Katherine Hale
Curt - Thanks for the fly-by-night introduction. This is what I was thinking in more detail. Again I know this is Java 5, so this would be for Log4J 2.0, although perhaps something comparable could be devised for the current Log4J. I'll just use debug as an example. I find myself frequently loggi

[g...@vmgump]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

2008-02-10 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44386] New: - NTEventLogAppender.dll for windows 64

2008-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu