Re: Handling Logging Events Directly

Looks like I may have posted to the wrong list. My bad. Matt bakermatt wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on a system implementing the log4j receivers that requires me > to directly access the LoggingEvent when it is posted to an appender. The > basic idea is to take external logging events, r

Handling Logging Events Directly

Hi, I am working on a system implementing the log4j receivers that requires me to directly access the LoggingEvent when it is posted to an appender. The basic idea is to take external logging events, read them in through a Receiver, and store data about them. Someone please let me know if I'm o

[g...@vmgump]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

Re: Varargs support to the sandbox

On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:35 PM, Katherine Hale wrote: Curt - Thanks for the fly-by-night introduction. This is what I was thinking in more detail. Again I know this is Java 5, so this would be for Log4J 2.0, although perhaps something comparable could be devised for the current Log4J. I'll