svn commit: r663835 - /logging/log4j/companions/extras/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling/CompositeTriggeringPolicyTest.java

2008-06-05 Thread sdeboy
Author: sdeboy Date: Thu Jun 5 23:18:43 2008 New Revision: 663835 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663835&view=rev Log: Add ASL header to test Modified: logging/log4j/companions/extras/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling/CompositeTriggeringPolicyTest.java Modified: logging/l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45147] New: Problem with conversion pattern. Line number not displayed correctly

2008-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45147 Summary: Problem with conversion pattern. Line number not displayed correctly Product: Log4j Version: 1.2 Platform: Sun OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW

svn commit: r663831 - in /logging/log4j/companions/extras/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling/CompositeTriggeringPolicy.java test/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling/CompositeTriggeringPolicyTest.

2008-06-05 Thread sdeboy
Author: sdeboy Date: Thu Jun 5 23:15:54 2008 New Revision: 663831 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663831&view=rev Log: Initial commit of a CompositeTriggeringPolicy and associated test. Allows multiple triggering policies to be 'or'd together to determine if an event should trigger rollin

Re: Proposed synchronization changes

2008-06-05 Thread Jacob Kjome
Hi Jess, I suggest you post a tracking bug report for this so that these changes don't just get lost on the list. Sounds like you did a lot of great work that could be the basis for Log4j-2.0. Maybe you can gather up enough steam to make 2.0 a reality. And I agree. JDK1.5+ should be what 2.0

Re: Proposed synchronization changes

2008-06-05 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jun 5, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Jess Holle wrote: For my own usage I went ahead and completed the a set of changes to reduce log4j 1.2.x's locking and deadlock potential. The results are attached and make unabashed use of Java 5 -- as from discussion to this point it seems clear that there is

Re: Proposed synchronization changes

2008-06-05 Thread Jess Holle
Jess Holle wrote: o I created an AppenderSkeleton alternative for our own usage similar to ConcurrentAppender but different in several respects. + ConcurrentAppender relies on all sorts of stuff from outside the core log4j jar -

Re: Proposed synchronization changes

2008-06-05 Thread Jess Holle
For my own usage I went ahead and completed the a set of changes to reduce log4j 1.2.x's locking and deadlock potential. The results are attached and make unabashed use of Java 5 -- as from discussion to this point it seems clear that there is no interest in making any of these sorts of change