https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52913
Gary Gregory changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52913
Gary Gregory changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28469|0 |1
is obsolete|
+1
Let's remove the old Chainsaw and Logfactor5 as well.
Scott
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > Fwiw - i don't think this really needs 3 PMC +1's to pass. If it does I
> have no problem providing one but I'm
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Fwiw - i don't think this really needs 3 PMC +1's to pass. If it does I have
> no problem providing one but I'm not really focused on 1.x.
Thats true, but I don't want to make such a move when somebody is
really opposed to it... hate rollback
Fwiw - i don't think this really needs 3 PMC +1's to pass. If it does I have no
problem providing one but I'm not really focused on 1.x.
Ralph
On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> +0.5
>
> Ralph
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 2:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> bef
+0.5
Ralph
On Apr 10, 2012, at 2:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> before easter we have discussed this already. I would like to remove
> jdk 1.3 support with the next log4j version 1.2.17. Because there are
> so many feelings out there, I would like to call out this vote before.
I don't have a vote, but in spirit I'm definitely +1.
At this point I'd be quite happy requiring Java 6. In fact the log4j I
use is patched with several locking improvements one of which requires
Java 6.
--
Jess Holle
On 4/10/2012 6:19 AM, Jacob Kjome wrote:
+1
Of course, I'd also like to
+1
Of course, I'd also like to see (copied from one of my previous posts)...
Extract LF5 and chainsaw 1.x from log4j.jar and release them as separate > jars, thus removing bloat from the Log4j library. They are not libraries, > but desktop tools, and can depend on the absolute latest version
Hello,
before easter we have discussed this already. I would like to remove
jdk 1.3 support with the next log4j version 1.2.17. Because there are
so many feelings out there, I would like to call out this vote before.
[] +1 go ahead
[] 0, don't care
[] -1 don't because...
I'll leave it open for t
