Thanks, Derek. All feedback is welcome.
When I first started naming things I had the "type" tacked on to the end. But
then I noticed that the appenders all had to appear within an appenders element
so adding "Appender" to the end of them all seemed pointless as they all
obviously had to be Appe
I'm incorporating log4j 2.0-alpha1 into an existing product to
replace/improve a logging infrastructure based on java.util.logging.
log4j2 looks rather nice, I like how it adds further refinement to slf4j's
improvements.
The configuration documentation is nice, but obviously it's all over the
map
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
Chadwick Baatz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cmba...@us.ibm.com
--
You are re
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53745
Assignee: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
Summary: Extra's RollingFileAppender Delete Files
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Li
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project logging-log4j-chainsaw has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
