Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello, +1 Great job Ralph! In addition to Ivans comments i have only recognized the following: - NOTICE/NOTICE.txt have different content - Do we need a TM on the log4j logo with the cup (right side)? Cheers Christian On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a vote to r

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks, Christian. Yes, the logo should have the TM. The best way is to add it to the logo itself, but I have not had much luck with that in the past. I think I will probably create a beta1 branch so we can fix some of the web site issues after the release. Oh. And here is my +1. Ralph On

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-89) roll over file any time in Rolling file

2012-09-21 Thread Tushar (JIRA)
Tushar created LOG4J2-89: Summary: roll over file any time in Rolling file Key: LOG4J2-89 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-89 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Type: Wish Components:

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-90) docs - tip for -server

2012-09-21 Thread Tushar (JIRA)
Tushar created LOG4J2-90: Summary: docs - tip for -server Key: LOG4J2-90 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-90 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Type: Improvement Components: Documentat

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-44) log4j java date wise log every X MB

2012-09-21 Thread Tushar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tushar closed LOG4J2-44. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-beta1 > log4j java date wise log every X MB > --

[RESULT][VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1

2012-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Christian Grobmeier, Ivan Habunek, Ralph Goers +1 (non binding): Oliver Lamy I will continue with the release process. Thank you all for taking the time to review the release Ralph --

Re: log4j2 site design

2012-09-21 Thread Ivan Habunek
On 21 September 2012 00:37, Ralph Goers wrote: > I do like that the text in the sidebar doesn't seem to wrap like it does with > the fluido skin. I'm not sure if that is just because it is wider or if it is > wider to accommodate the text. > > Can you modify it to incorporate the header? I'll g

Re: log4j2 site design

2012-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Ivan Habunek wrote: > On 21 September 2012 00:37, Ralph Goers wrote: >> I do like that the text in the sidebar doesn't seem to wrap like it does >> with the fluido skin. I'm not sure if that is just because it is wider or if >> it is wider to accommodate the tex

Re: log4j2 site design

2012-09-21 Thread Ivan Habunek
On 21 September 2012 21:00, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Maybe it's time to try git-svn. > > Its fine with git-svn... if you need a starter: > http://wiki.apache.org/logging/UsingGitWithLogging > > Cheers! Thanks, just what I needed. :) Ivan

Re: log4j2 site design

2012-09-21 Thread Ivan Habunek
Ralph, How would you feel about breaking up the really long pages, e.g. configuration, into smaller ones? I've done a quick demo of how that would look (note that I've only done configuration, not others). http://bezdomni.net/log4j2/manual/configuration/index.html It may require a little bit of

Re: log4j2 site design

2012-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Ivan Habunek wrote: > Ralph, > > How would you feel about breaking up the really long pages, e.g. > configuration, into smaller ones? I see, it is always good to have a web dev in team. Personally I like this very much. Cheers PS: as you may have noticed, I am n

Re: log4j2 site design

2012-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Yeah - I agree on both counts. You will notice I did the same thing with the API. The only thing I would suggest is, like is done with the API, add the "chapter" to the beginning of each section, although I'm not really sure why I like that since it is obvious what chapter you are in from the

Logging site

2012-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
I changed the main web page so that Log4j says beta instead of alpha quite a while ago. I've checked it out from svn and verified that the change was made, yet I don't see it when I navigate to the site. Can you confirm whether or not it changed? If it didn't that would mean something went wron

Re: Logging site

2012-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
I see alpha as well. looks like something is wrong with the cms On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I changed the main web page so that Log4j says beta instead of alpha quite a > while ago. I've checked it out from svn and verified that the change was > made, yet I don't see i

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Logging log4j 2.0-beta1 released

2012-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
The Apache Logging team is pleased to announce the Apache log4j 2.0-beta1 release! Apache log4j is a well known framework for logging application behavior. Log4j 2 is an upgrade to Log4j that provides significant improvements over its predecessor, Log4j 1.x, and provides many of the improveme