[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-342) XML configurator logs errors when it sees xml:base attributes

2013-08-13 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers resolved LOG4J2-342. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-beta9 Fixed in revision 1513360. Please verify and

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-326) request to improve the RoutingAppender

2013-08-13 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13737905#comment-13737905 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-326: Can this issue be closed?

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-332) Don't talk about SLF4J Bridge but SLF4J Binding as it is the official SLF4J term

2013-08-13 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers resolved LOG4J2-332. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-beta9 Patch applied in revision 1513365. Please verify

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-346) Cyclic dependency in OSGi-context. Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding - slf4j-api

2013-08-13 Thread Roland Weiglhofer (JIRA)
Roland Weiglhofer created LOG4J2-346: Summary: Cyclic dependency in OSGi-context. Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding - slf4j-api Key: LOG4J2-346 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-346

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-346) Cyclic dependency in OSGi-context. Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding - slf4j-api

2013-08-13 Thread Roland Weiglhofer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13738025#comment-13738025 ] Roland Weiglhofer commented on LOG4J2-346: -- Please, we need a solution for our

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-346) Cyclic dependency in OSGi-context. Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding - slf4j-api

2013-08-13 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13738064#comment-13738064 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-346: Roland, we are all volunteers working on log4j in

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-346) Cyclic dependency in OSGi-context. Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding - slf4j-api

2013-08-13 Thread Roland Weiglhofer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13738072#comment-13738072 ] Roland Weiglhofer commented on LOG4J2-346: -- okay. I get it. Thanks for your

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-342) XML configurator logs errors when it sees xml:base attributes

2013-08-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Process question: Is the workflow to really closed as opposed to resolve? I just want to make sure. In other projects (most if not all Commons components), we resolved when a commit fixes an issue and close when the component is released. Thank you, Gary On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Ralph

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-310) SMTPAppender does not send mails with error or fatal level without prior info event

2013-08-13 Thread Olivier Lemasle (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Olivier Lemasle updated LOG4J2-310: --- Attachment: log4j2-310.patch Hello, I've attached a very simple patch with unit test, which

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-336) AsyncLogger.log fail with NullPointerException after double reconfigure

2013-08-13 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13739082#comment-13739082 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-336: I was finally able to track this down to an

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-347) Name the AsyncThread

2013-08-13 Thread David Phillips (JIRA)
David Phillips created LOG4J2-347: - Summary: Name the AsyncThread Key: LOG4J2-347 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-347 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Assigned] (LOG4J2-347) Name the AsyncThread

2013-08-13 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma reassigned LOG4J2-347: -- Assignee: Remko Popma Name the AsyncThread Key:

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-347) Name the AsyncThread

2013-08-13 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma resolved LOG4J2-347. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-beta9 Fixed in revision 1513710. Please verify and

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-342) XML configurator logs errors when it sees xml:base attributes

2013-08-13 Thread Nick Williams
That's the workflow I'm used to as well. We resolve the issue, user closes it. Nick On Aug 13, 2013, at 8:57 PM, Remko Popma wrote: My understanding was that it is up to the original reporter to close the issue (after verifying that the fix actually helped). On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-333) match artifact ids with Maven module names

2013-08-13 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13739150#comment-13739150 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-333: Is Blocker the correct priority for this issue?

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-342) XML configurator logs errors when it sees xml:base attributes

2013-08-13 Thread Ralph Goers
I also prefer that workflow. However, I have no problem in marking the issue closed after the release if the user doesn't do it prior to it. Ralph On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Nick Williams wrote: That's the workflow I'm used to as well. We resolve the issue, user closes it. Nick On

Need to add attribute to manifest file of log4j-1.2.8.jar

2013-08-13 Thread Himanshu Gusain -X (hgusain - ARICENT TECHNOLOGIES MAURIITIUS LIMITED at Cisco)
Hi , We are using log4j-1.2.8.jar by apache. But, due to new java 7 releases by oracle our applet starts throwing the new prompts they introduced for mixed code in their java 7 update 21 releasehttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u21-relnotes-1932873.html. Now to remove these