Hi All
Consider following scenario
1) Application is writing to exception.current log file which has time
based rolling policy.
2) Once the rolling interval passed, exception.current should be renamed to
exception.04042014 and new exception.current file should be started.
Is there any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Brouwer updated LOG4J2-547:
-
Attachment: (was: log4j2-547-builders-and-more.patch)
Update LoggerStream API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13972262#comment-13972262
]
Bruce Brouwer edited comment on LOG4J2-547 at 4/17/14 12:13 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Brouwer updated LOG4J2-547:
-
Attachment: log4j2-547-builders.patch
Update LoggerStream API
---
Now I am confused. I thought we decided to keep this in a branch, I could
be wrong since there have been many back and forths. As of now, this means
it will be released in 2.0. If so, why is it not in the core or api module?
Gary
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:45 PM, mattsic...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not very good at subversion. I just put it in the trunk. If someone
could move it to a branch, that would be great. Same goes for the
experimental log4j-camel module I started yesterday.
On 17 April 2014 06:49, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I am confused. I thought we
We could, but to be honest I think it's an extremely rare scenario that the
buffer has so many events that it takes 10 secs to write them all to disk.
Remko
Sent from my iPhone
On 2014/04/17, at 21:11, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Thread.sleep(HALF_A_SECOND);
Shouldn't
Can't both log4j and log4j2 already do this?
In your config, specify fileName=exception.current and
filePattern=exception.%d{MMdd}. See the example config for
RollingAppender
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders.html#RollingFileAppender
Regards,
Remko
Sent from my iPhone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebastian Audet updated LOG4J2-607:
---
Attachment: log4j2.json
Updated with an example failing JSON file - this works except the
Matt,
Creating a branch in subversion is trivial. A quick google would give you the
answer to that.
Everyone - Do we already have a sandbox?
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not very good at subversion. I just put it in the trunk. If someone could
I know how to create one, but not retroactively.
On 17 April 2014 10:11, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Matt,
Creating a branch in subversion is trivial. A quick google would give you
the answer to that.
Everyone - Do we already have a sandbox?
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2014, at
I've got a few topics to mention.
1. Should we consider making a 2.0 release branch so that trunk can
continue to be the active development branch? That way we can work on new
things while just ironing out the remaining issues for 2.0 GA in the 2.0
branch. Unless you guys prefer a different
Google “svn move”.
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:
I know how to create one, but not retroactively.
On 17 April 2014 10:11, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Matt,
Creating a branch in subversion is trivial. A quick google would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973232#comment-13973232
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-607:
Confirmed this issue using the provided
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Sicker updated LOG4J2-607:
---
Environment: Windows 7, JVM 7, Tomcat 7. Also tested using Mac OS X
and JVM 8 (Tomcat 7).
If you want to retroactively create a branch, and you're doing Eclipse,
simply show the project's SVN history; then select create a branch at the
revision you want to split from.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
Google “svn move”.
Ralph
On Apr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973243#comment-13973243
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-607:
I tried translating the file to XML and it didn't
Thanks, Ralph. I'll move the experimental code to a feature branch.
On 17 April 2014 12:27, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
If you want to retroactively create a branch, and you're doing Eclipse,
simply show the project's SVN history; then select create a branch at the
revision you
Done. Deleted the two modules after branching to branches/experimental.
On 17 April 2014 12:33, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Ralph. I'll move the experimental code to a feature branch.
On 17 April 2014 12:27, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
If you want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973269#comment-13973269
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-607:
If you run the CustomConfigurationTest, you'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973269#comment-13973269
]
Matt Sicker edited comment on LOG4J2-607 at 4/17/14 6:47 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Sicker reassigned LOG4J2-607:
--
Assignee: Matt Sicker
log4j2 json files do not support property substitutions
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
internet,PackerCollegiate (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973287#comment-13973287
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-607:
Looks like this might be a problem related to not
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
internet,PackerCollegiate (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)
1. I prefer trunk to be the stable branch. In addition to the 2.0 tag I would
also cut a branch when 2.0 is finally released.
2. I could swear we have always generated the OSGi MANIFEST.MF and people said
it wasn’t sufficient, but if they aren’t there then I guess I am wrong.
3. I would like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973358#comment-13973358
]
Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-607 at 4/17/14 8:32 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973358#comment-13973358
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-607:
The error with not having the properties at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973358#comment-13973358
]
Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-607 at 4/17/14 9:16 PM:
-
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
1. I prefer trunk to be the stable branch. In addition to the 2.0 tag I
would also cut a branch when 2.0 is finally released.
+1, ideally we can cut releases at any time out of trunk for log4j.
Experimentation can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973501#comment-13973501
]
Sebastian Audet commented on LOG4J2-607:
Is the mentioned fix in RC1 yet? Or will
This discussion about having modules or not having modules keeps coming up
and I see different opinions here on the log4j team. Generally, the
argument of please, no more modules has won. I wanted to present my
perspective to see if I can sway anyone's opinion.
There are plenty of reasons why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13973527#comment-13973527
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-607:
With regard to the unit test, I suspect the bug
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
internet,PackerCollegiate (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)
You can also take a page out of JUnit's playbook. They release an
experimental jar in each production release so you test out unfinished
features before they become officially supported.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM,
I agree with you completely. In fact, the items you have specifically
identified are where I would start. Are there more?
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Bruce Brouwer bruce.brou...@gmail.com wrote:
This discussion about having modules or not having modules keeps coming up
and I see
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
internet,PackerCollegiate (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)
37 matches
Mail list logo
