[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1011) Dependencies for layouts should be documentated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15268168#comment-15268168 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1011: - What is the status of this one? I vaguely rem

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-836) Binary Logging Appender

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-836: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.6) > Binary Logging Appender > --- > >

Re: logging-log4j2 git commit: LogEvent memento

Yeah, I'm not a fan of wildcard imports either. Gary On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > You need to review http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/javastyle.html. In > particular you reordered the imports when they were correct to start with > and you changed specific imports to a

Re: logging-log4j2 git commit: [LOG4J2-494] Support merging configurations to for a composite configuration. Fix typo.

Thanks for fixing my typo but the sentence still makes no sense! Ralph > On May 2, 2016, at 2:24 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: > > Repository: logging-log4j2 > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master fc19d684a -> ad5073c05 > > > [LOG4J2-494] Support merging configurations to for a composite >

Re: logging-log4j2 git commit: LogEvent memento

You need to review http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/javastyle.html . In particular you reordered the imports when they were correct to start with and you changed specific imports to a wildcard import. Ralph > On Apr 27, 2016, at 10:04 AM,

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267795#comment-15267795 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1179: - added Gelf to the list. > Log4j performance d

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1179: Description: Reorganize and extend performance data on the site. *Async Loggers Manual Page* Shoul

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267747#comment-15267747 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1376: -- [~niggemannmj]: I would say go for the "righ

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267671#comment-15267671 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1376: - This is a layout. The configuration is a Strin

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267632#comment-15267632 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1376: -- Let's see what others think... an int seems

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267622#comment-15267622 ] Mark Niggemann commented on LOG4J2-1376: Ouch. This is getting a little ugly. The

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-621) Pattern to drop first N package parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267543#comment-15267543 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LOG4J2-621: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-621) Pattern to drop first N package parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated LOG4J2-621: Description: Currently you can have a pattern that will print out the last N parts of you package.

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-621) Pattern to drop first N package parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated LOG4J2-621: Summary: Pattern to drop first N package parts (was: Pattern To Drop First X Package Parts) > Patt

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267538#comment-15267538 ] Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1376: - You can make a pull request on GitHub if you'd

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267534#comment-15267534 ] Mark Niggemann commented on LOG4J2-1376: Yes, I'd like to but I've never really c

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267529#comment-15267529 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1376: -- Would you be willing to submit a patch? > R

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267528#comment-15267528 ] Mark Niggemann commented on LOG4J2-1376: Agreed. That is wise. > RFC5424 Enterpr

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267524#comment-15267524 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1376: -- Should we use Java's own https://docs.oracl

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267512#comment-15267512 ] Mark Niggemann edited comment on LOG4J2-1376 at 5/2/16 9:10 PM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267512#comment-15267512 ] Mark Niggemann edited comment on LOG4J2-1376 at 5/2/16 9:09 PM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267512#comment-15267512 ] Mark Niggemann edited comment on LOG4J2-1376 at 5/2/16 9:09 PM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267512#comment-15267512 ] Mark Niggemann edited comment on LOG4J2-1376 at 5/2/16 9:09 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267512#comment-15267512 ] Mark Niggemann commented on LOG4J2-1376: Enterprise number should be a string, bu

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1377) Rfc5424Layout should allow for setting the process id instead of returning '-'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267504#comment-15267504 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1377: -- Optionally using JMX (but not all environmen

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-1377) Rfc5424Layout should allow for setting the process id instead of returning '-'

Mark Niggemann created LOG4J2-1377: -- Summary: Rfc5424Layout should allow for setting the process id instead of returning '-' Key: LOG4J2-1377 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1377 Pr

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15267474#comment-15267474 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1376: -- We could change {{org.apache.logging.log4j.

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-1376) RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment.

Mark Niggemann created LOG4J2-1376: -- Summary: RFC5424 Enterprise Number should be an OID fragment. Key: LOG4J2-1376 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1376 Project: Log4j 2 Is

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15266730#comment-15266730 ] Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-1179: Can we include GelfLayout in the layout

Re: Performance page

I will flesh things out further in this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179 On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > This all sounds really good! > > Yes, the filter comparison isn’t as clear as it should be. Yes, it is how > long it takes to deny the events in

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1179: Description: Reorganize and extend performance data on the site. *Async Loggers Manual Page* Shoul