[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283793#comment-15283793 ] Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-1179 at 5/15/16 5:08 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283793#comment-15283793 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1179: - I modified the tests and made them @State(Scoe

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283791#comment-15283791 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1179: - The ThreadContext is obviously per thread. If

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283788#comment-15283788 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1179: - One thing I noticed is that the benchmark has

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283778#comment-15283778 ] Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1179: - Yes I wanted to use bar charts for throughput

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283761#comment-15283761 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1179: - So you converted this to messages per second?

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1179) Log4j performance documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1179: Attachment: FilterPerformanceComparison.png Ralph, thanks for creating the Filter benchmarks. Here

Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #1948

See Changes: [rgoers] Add benchmarks for markerfilter and mdcfilter [rgoers] Remove unnecessary paragraph -- [...truncated 22842 lines...] Running org.apache.logging.log4j.jul.ApiLoggerTest Tests ru

Re: Site preview

ok, thanks. On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I just did. > > Ralph > > On May 14, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > OK. I am just about to check in the benchmarks and graphs for those two > tests. Please verify the benchmarks after I do. > > Ralph > > On May 14, 2

Re: Site preview

I just did. Ralph > On May 14, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > OK. I am just about to check in the benchmarks and graphs for those two > tests. Please verify the benchmarks after I do. > > Ralph > >> On May 14, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Remko Popma > > wrote:

Re: Site preview

OK. I am just about to check in the benchmarks and graphs for those two tests. Please verify the benchmarks after I do. Ralph > On May 14, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > Sorry for the confusion. Don't worry: I still need to create a JMH benchmark > for the filters, turn it into a

Re: Site preview

Sorry for the confusion. Don't worry: I still need to create a JMH benchmark for the filters, turn it into a nice graph and rewrite the last paragraph. That part of the page isn't done yet. I use Excel for the throughput graphs, HdrHistogram comes with a Google chart thingy for the latency gr

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #1946

I thought we disabled the faulty jenkins slaves? On 14 May 2016 at 06:03, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [rpopma] LOG4J2-1179 fixed latency section of Async Loggers page > > -- >

Re: Site preview

What are you using to create the charts? I would still like to redo the filter comparison. Ralph > On May 14, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > Still working on the performance page, but a draft of the new pages is > available here > http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/performance

Re: Site preview

The final paragraph should be removed. I believe only the filter comparison test still applies. Sent from my iPad > On May 14, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > Still working on the performance page, but a draft of the new pages is > available here > http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4

Site preview

Still working on the performance page, but a draft of the new pages is available here http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/performance.html and here http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/manual/garbagefree.html Feedback welcome! Remko

Jenkins build is back to normal : Log4j 2.x #1947

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-1297) Document "gc-free" configuration and performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma resolved LOG4J2-1297. - Resolution: Fixed > Document "gc-free" configuration and performance > --

Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #1946

See Changes: [rpopma] LOG4J2-1179 fixed latency section of Async Loggers page -- [...truncated 22447 lines...] Running org.apache.logging.log4j.jul.DefaultLevelConverterTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0

Jenkins build is back to stable : Log4j 2.x #1945

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: Log4j 2.x #1944

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org