On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:08:59 -0500
Gary Gregory wrote:
If you find classes where it makes sense to alphabetize, go for it. But
doing this for every class without regard to co-location of related methods
is counterproductive, IMO. For instance, for logger, I would order them by
the level they r
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jacob Kjome wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:29:42 -0500
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> I'd like to keep methods in alphabetical order in source files. Is that
>> controversial for anyone? I know it makes for noisy commits so I would do
>> it one file at
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:29:42 -0500
Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
I'd like to keep methods in alphabetical order in source files. Is that
controversial for anyone? I know it makes for noisy commits so I would do
it one file at a time when I run into it or in a whole batch. Thoughts?
I find this
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> For me, I find it disconcerting when I see (in Eclipse) the methods in the
> Members view in a different order than in the editor. I see A next to B in
> the view, but in the editor A is followed by Z, it's just weird. I'm just
> weird ;)
haha
For me, I find it disconcerting when I see (in Eclipse) the methods in the
Members view in a different order than in the editor. I see A next to B in
the view, but in the editor A is followed by Z, it's just weird. I'm just
weird ;)
In my Smalltalk days, we had method categories as a formal concep
