On May 26, 2005, at 11:19 PM, Mark Womack wrote:
It just seems wierd to me that the 1.2 stuff has it's own version
of all the web pages. These are not uploaded to the logging site,
right? The ones from logging-site cvs are uploaded to the site?
Would appreciate some help figuring this
* docs/index.html is a page that is a little too "new". For example, the
side bar has a Chainsaw link in it that goes nowhere. Hmmm..
The html gets generated from the src/xdocs in the 1.2 branch, not from the
logging-site cvs like I previously thought. It just uses logging-site for
the ana
At 12:37 PM 5/23/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>
>- The tar error when unpacking. I updated to Ant 1.6.4 for the next build.
>It should be resolved with that.
I'm using Ant-1.6.4 on WinXP SP2 and I don't know about unpacking, but when
I run the "dist" target (against the HEAD) and Ant attempts to gene
Hi,
> And the source headers still reference the 1.1 license. If we update the
> license, we will need to update all the source headers. I don't know the
> answer here. Ceki, Yoav, do you know the policy regarding the updating of
> the license with releases like this? I guess we can always ask
> Initial scan that I've found are (and these are probably just left
> over stuff from 1.2.8/9 release)
>
> * LICENSE.txt is 1.1 License. Do we need to update that to 2.0?
And the source headers still reference the 1.1 license. If we update the
license, we will need to update all the source hea
Thanks. Guess I'll go upgrade.
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Kitching" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: 1.2.11rc1 Build
Changes from Ant 1.6.2 to Ant 1.6.3
==
gt; -Mark
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Kitching" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Log4J Developers List"
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 9:02 PM
> Subject: Re: 1.2.11rc1 Build
>
>
> > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 13:48 +1000, Paul Smith w
Hm. I am using Ant 1.6.2, which should have the fix?
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Kitching" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: 1.2.11rc1 Build
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 13:48 +1000, Pa
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 13:48 +1000, Paul Smith wrote:
> yep, that tar's downloading ok.
>
> The tar has an error when unpacking though, or maybe it's just a
> warning. When I do
>
> tar xfz logg*.tar.gz
>
> I get:
>
> tar: A lone zero block at 18809
That's a known bug in the Ant tar task: se
x27;m using Mac OS X 10.4.1.
cheers,
Paul
On 23/05/2005, at 1:36 PM, Mark Womack wrote:
Try it now. forgot to apply the right chmod.
-Mark
- Original Message - From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 8:2
Initial scan that I've found are (and these are probably just left
over stuff from 1.2.8/9 release)
* LICENSE.txt is 1.1 License. Do we need to update that to 2.0?
* INSTALL file references the old 'jakarta' directory naming days.
Do we want to update that? I'm sure it won't hinder people,
Try it now. forgot to apply the right chmod.
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: 1.2.11rc1 Build
I'm getting "Forbidden" on the tar.
I'm getting "Forbidden" on the tar.
cheers,
Paul
On 23/05/2005, at 1:25 PM, Mark Womack wrote:
I went ahead with an official build of the current 1_2branch for
the 1.2.11 release. The result is an rc1 version that can be
accessed at:
http://people.apache.org/~mwomack/log4j-1.2.11rc1/
I
I went ahead with an official build of the current 1_2branch for the 1.2.11
release. The result is an rc1 version that can be accessed at:
http://people.apache.org/~mwomack/log4j-1.2.11rc1/
I want to take a couple days making sure all is happy with this build since
this is my first official b
14 matches
Mail list logo
