[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma closed LOG4J2-1388.
---
> Upgrade allocation-instrumenter from 3.0 to 3.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma resolved LOG4J2-1388.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in master in commit a70ea25.
> Upgrade allocation-instrumenter from
Remko Popma created LOG4J2-1388:
---
Summary: Upgrade allocation-instrumenter from 3.0 to 3.0.1
Key: LOG4J2-1388
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1388
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type
FYI
> From: Colin Decker
> Date: 2016年5月17日 4:09:34 JST
> To: google/allocation-instrumenter
>
> Cc: Remko Popma , Author
> Subject: Re: [google/allocation-instrumenter] NullPointerException in other
> shutdown hooks (#15)
> Reply-To: google/allocation-instrumenter
Created pull request with the fix that Ami suggested.
https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter/pull/16
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Ami Fischman wrote:
> Replied on public issue.
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:44 PM Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> (Added Jeremy Manson a
(Added Jeremy Manson and Ami Fischman to recipients)
Guys, we're interested in fixing this concurrency bug in
AllocationRecorder:
https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter/issues/15
What would be the best way to accomplish this?
Remko Popma
On Friday, 29 April 2016, Remko Popma
che github account?
>
> Gary
>
> On May 3, 2016 12:02 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote:
> >
> > Guess we have to fork it?
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On May 3, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yikes, no rep
; Guess we have to fork it?
>> >
>> > Ralph
>> >
>> >> On May 3, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yikes, no reply on
>> >> https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter/issues/15
>> >>
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Guess we have to fork it?
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On May 3, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory >> <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yikes, no reply on
> >
Do we fork it under one of our accounts or the apache github account?
Gary
On May 3, 2016 12:02 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote:
>
> Guess we have to fork it?
>
> Ralph
>
>> On May 3, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> Yikes, no reply on
https:
Guess we have to fork it?
Ralph
> On May 3, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Yikes, no reply on
> https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter/issues/15
> <https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter/issues/15>
>
> G
>
> On Thu, Apr
Yikes, no reply on
https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter/issues/15
G
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> I'm contacting you because you are listed as one of the contributors to
> the allocation-instrumenter
> <https://githu
Hi Colin,
I'm contacting you because you are listed as one of the contributors to the
allocation-instrumenter <https://github.com/google/allocation-instrumenter>
project on GitHub.
We are working on Log4j 2 <http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/>, and the
main theme of the upcomi
13 matches
Mail list logo